High Court Kerala High Court

Seena vs K.S.Ramachandra Kuruppu on 8 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
Seena vs K.S.Ramachandra Kuruppu on 8 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1730 of 2008()


1. SEENA, AGED 30 YEARS, W/O.LATE SANTHOSH,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. MINOR LAKSHMI, AGED 6 YEARS,
3. MINOR MALAVIKA, AGED 3 YEARS,
4. MONOR UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 8 MONTHS,
5. NARAYANAN AGED 72 YEARS,
6. REMANY NARAYANAN, AGED 60 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. K.S.RAMACHANDRA KURUPPU, ANANDHA BHAVAN,
                       ...       Respondent

2. C.SIVAPRASAD, S/O.M.CHELLAPPAN PILLAI,

3. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD, DIVISION

                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJIT

                For Respondent  :SRI.JOE KALLIATH

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI

 Dated :08/10/2010

 O R D E R
             A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.
                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                            M.A.C.A.No.1730 OF 2008
                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                   Dated this the 8th day of October, 2010

                                JUDGMENT

Barkath Ali, J.

Appellants are the claimants in OP(MV)No.103/2005 on the file

of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thrissur. They are the wife,

children and parents of deceased Santhosh who died in a motor

accident. On May 25, 2004, while Santhosh was riding his motor

cycle along public road and reached near Kaiparambu, he was knocked

down by the lorry bearing Reg.No.KL 2/B 910 driven by the first

respondent. The deceased sustained serious injuries and he succumbed

to the injuries sustained while undergoing treatment in the hospital.

Alleging negligence against the driver of the lorry, the first

respondent, the claimants filed the OP under Sec.166 of the Motor

Vehicles Act claiming a compensation of Rs.40,00,000/-.

2. Respondents 1 and 2, the driver and the owner of the

offending lorry remained absent before the Tribunal. The third

respondent, the insurer of the offending lorry filed a written statement

MACA.No.1730/08 2

admitting the policy of the lorry.

3. PW1 was examined and Exts.A1 to A6 were marked on the

side of the claimants before the Tribunal. Exts.B1 was marked on the

side of the contesting third respondent. On an appreciation of

evidence the Tribunal found that the accident occurred due to the

negligence of the first respondent and awarded a total compensation of

Rs.10,49,500/- with interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date

of petition till realisation. The claimants have now come up in appeal

challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

4. Heard counsel for the appellants/claimants and the counsel for

the Insurance Company.

5. The accident is not disputed. The finding of the Tribunal

that the accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the

driver of the lorry is not challenged in this appeal. Therefore the only

question which arises for consideration is whether the claimants are

entitled to any enhanced compensation.

6. The Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.10,49,500/-

The break up of the compensation amount awarded is as under:

MACA.No.1730/08 3

           Loss of earning               - Rs. 6,000/-
           Exp. for transportation       - Rs. 500/-
           Damage to clothing            - Rs.   1,000/-
           Exp. for treatment            - Rs.1,81,000/-
           Exp. for bystander            - Rs. 3,000/-
           Exp. for funeral              - Rs. 5,000/-
           Pain and suffering            - Rs. 20,000/-
           Loss of love and affection    - Rs. 15,000/-
           Loss of dependency            - Rs.7,68,000/-
           Loss of estate                - Rs. 30,000/-
           Loss of consortium            - Rs. 20,000/-


7. The Counsel for the claimants sought enhancement of the

compensation awarded for the loss of dependency, for loss of love and

affection and for pain and suffering endured by the deceased .

8. The Tribunal took the monthly income of the deceased as

Rs.6,000/- and after deducting 1/3 for his personal expenses, the

balance amount of Rs. 4,000/- was taken was his monthly contribution

to his family and adopted a multiplier of 16 and awarded

Rs. 7,68,000/- for the loss of dependency. The deceased was working

as an Area Sales Manager in M/s.Smith and Nephew Health Care

Private Limited and used to earn Rs. 35,000/- per month, according to

the claimants. They produced Ext.A15, the pay slips issued from the

company. Ext.A11, the details regarding the remuneration and benefits

MACA.No.1730/08 4

received by the deceased, shows that he had a basic salary of

Rs. 5440/-with allowances which come to Rs. 8209/- per month.

Taking into consideration all these aspects, we feel that the monthly

income of the deceased can be reasonably fixed at Rs. 6,500/- which

comes to Rs. 78,000/- per annum. After deducting 1/3 for his personal

expenses, the balance amount of Rs. 52,000/- can be taken as his

annual contribution to his family. The Tribunal adopted a multiplier of

16 which is not seriously challenged. Thus calculated for the loss of

dependency, the claimants are entitled to a compensation of

Rs. 8,32,000/- ( 52,000 x 16). Thus on this count, the claimants are

entitled to an additional compensation of Rs.64,000/-.

9. For loss of love and affection, Rs. 15,000/- was awarded by

the Tribunal which appears to be quite inadequate. Taking into

consideration the age of the claimants, we feel that a compensation of

Rs. 30,000/- would be reasonable on this count. Thus, on this count, the

claimants are entitled to an additional compensation of Rs.15,000/-.

10. For the pain and suffering endured, Rs. 20,000/- was

awarded by the Tribunal which appears to be very low. Taking into

MACA.No.1730/08 5

consideration the fact that deceased was hospitalised for one month, we

feel that a compensation of Rs. 50,000/- would be reasonable on this

count. Thus, on this count, the claimants are entitled to an additional

compensation of Rs.30,000/-. As regards the compensation awarded

under other heads, we find the same to be reasonable and therefore are

not disturbing the same.

11. In the result, the claimants are found entitled to an

additional compensation of Rs. 1,09,000/-. They are entitled to interest

@ 7% per annum from the date of petition till realisation and

proportionate cost. The third respondent being the insurer of the

offending vehicle shall deposit the amount before the Tribunal within

two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The

award of the Tribunal is modified to the above extent.

The Appeal is disposed of as found above.

A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE

P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE

sv

MACA.No.1730/08 6