Central Information Commission Judgements

Mr.G S Rathore vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 May, 2010

Central Information Commission
Mr.G S Rathore vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 May, 2010
                               Central  Information Commission
                                                                                                 No. CIC/AD/A/2010/000525

                                                                                                         Dated: May 21, 2010




Name of the Appellant              :                                                          Mr. G S Rathore

Name of the Public Authority   :                                            W Railway, Church Gate, 



Background

:

1. Mr. G S Rathore from Rajasthan filed an RTI application on 14.09.2009 with the PIO W. Rly 

seeking   copies   of   documents   relating   to   his   promotion   and   ACRs   from   1990   to   2005   and 

requested to provide him information regarding the action taken on the basis of his complaint 

against   the   Railway   officials   involved   in   Corruption.   The   PIO   in   his   letter   dated   07.10.2009 

submitted   part   of   the   information   and   informed   the   Applicant   that   his   application   has   been 

transferred to the concerned PIO for the supply of remaining information. The Applicant filed his 

first appeal to the concerned authorities on 09.11.2009 seeking the copies of  ACRs once again 

also information on the actions taken on the basis of his complaint. The First Appellate Authority 

in his letter dated 17.12.2009 stated that his request for ACRs was transferred to the CPIO of SE 

RLY whereas the Appellant was working at W RLY. Not satisfied with the reply, the Applicant 

filed the Second Appeal before the Commission on 03.02.2010 for the copies of ACRs. 

2. The bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner, would hear this matter for 21sh 

May, 2010.

3. Mr.   Kedar   Harshe,   Deputy   Secretary   (confidential)   –   W   RLY,   Mr.   S   D   Marshale:   APIO, 

Mr.   N.M.   Kamad,   Gazzeted   APO   and   Mr.   P.S.   Sen   Gupta,   Public   Information   Inspector 

represented the Public Authority and were heard through Video Conferencing.

4. The Appellant was not present during the hearing.

Decision:

5. After hearing the Respondent the Commission holds that complete information has been provided 

to the Appellant except the information sought against point 6 of the RTI application regarding the 

action taken on the basis of the Appellant’s   complaint against the Railway officials involved in 

Corruption. The Appellant is advised to provide specific details about the complaints filed by him 

(dates, addressed to whom)  against point 6 as sought by the Respondent so that information can 

be furnished by the PIO.

6. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

(Annapurna Dixit)

Information Commissioner

Authenticated true copy:

(G. Subramanian)
Deputy Registrar

Cc:

1. Mr. G S Rathore,
Ex­DEE/DAHOD, New DY CSAO/BSP,
211/45, First Lane, Gulab Bari, Ajmer,
Rajhasthan

2. The Public Information Officer,
Western Railway, Churchgate, 
Mumbai

3. The Appellate Authority,
Western Railway, Churchgate,
Mumbai

4. Officer in charge, NIC

5. Press E Group, CIC