IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 483 of 2011
...
1. Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Yadav @ Gorakh Yadav
2. Anil Yadav
3. Sushil Yadav @ Sushil Kumar Yadav
4. Kundan Devi ... ... Petitioners
V e r s u s
The State of Jharkhand & Another ... ... Opposite Parties
...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR.
...
For the Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar No.2, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. V.S. Jha, A.P.P.
...
02/24.03.2011
Anticipatory bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Yadav @
Sunil Yadav @ Gorakh Yadav, Anil Yadav, Sushil Yadav @ Sushil
Kumar Yadav and Kundan Devi, is moved by Sri Manoj Kumar No.2,
learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri V.S. Jha,
learned counsel for the State.
Apart from other offences, accusation was also made against
the petitioners under Sections 3/4 of Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Thus, as per Section
18 of the aforesaid Act, this anticipatory bail application is not
maintainable.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
(Prashant Kumar, J.)
sunil/