High Court Kerala High Court

T.V.Abdul Gafoor vs The District Collector on 28 July, 2009

Kerala High Court
T.V.Abdul Gafoor vs The District Collector on 28 July, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 21233 of 2009(Y)


1. T.V.ABDUL GAFOOR, AGED 64 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)

3. SALES TAX OFFICER,

4. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.),

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.N.SANJITH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :28/07/2009

 O R D E R
                  P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
              ........................................................................
                  W.P.(C) No. 21233 OF 2009
              .........................................................................
                       Dated this the 28              th July, 2009


                                  J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved of the coercive steps stated as

being pursued against him notwithstanding pendency of Ext. P3

statutory appeal. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner has already preferred Ext. P5 reply in

response to Ext. P4 show cause notice and that the steps stated

as now being pursued against the petitioner are absolutely

without any rhyme or reason.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances, there will be a

direction to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Addl. Bench,

Kozhikode to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P3

appeal as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within one

month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment,

especially in view of the fact that the final hearing has already

W.P.(C) No. 21233 OF 2009

2

been held ten days back, as submitted by the learned Counsel for

the petitioner. It is also made clear that no coercive steps shall

be pursued against the petitioner till finalisation of the

proceedings as above.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,
JUDGE.

lk