Ramavatar Paswan &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 14 December, 2010

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CWJC No.3568 of 2010
                 1. RAMAVATAR PASWAN S/O SHRI BASUDEO PASWAN
                 R/O VILL.- BIRDIMA, P.O. BIRDIMA BAZAR, P.S.
                 BARURAJ, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR
                 2. RAMESH KUMAR SAHAY S/O SHRI DEOKI NANDAN
                 SAHAY R/O VILLAGE/MOHALLA- ANANDPURI
                 BIBIGANJ (WARD NO.7), P.S. SADAR, DISTT.-
                 MUZAFFARPUR
                 3. MADHUSUDAN PRASAD SRIVASTAVA S/O SHRI
                 MANORANJAN PRASAD SRIVASTAVA R/O VILL.-
                 DHARPHARI, P.O. DHARPHARI, P.S. DEVARIYA KOTHI,
                 DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR
                 4. RAMESHWAR DAS S/O SHRI KISHUNDEO DAS R/O
                 VILL.- RASULPUR JUMEDA, P.O. + P.S. MOTIPUR,
                 DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR
                 5. CHANDRA SHEKHAR PRASAD S/O LATE
                 RAMCHANDRA PRASAD R/O VILLAGE/MOHALLA-
                 MOFATLAL GALLI MOTIJHEEL, P.S. NAGAR, DISTT.-
                 MUZAFFARPUR
                                          Versus
                  1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                  2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH & FAMILY
                  WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW
                  SECRETARIAT, PATNA
                  3. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER HEALTH &
                  FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR,
                  NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA
                  4. THE DIRECTOR IN CHIEF HEALTH SERVICES,
                  GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA
                  5. THE CHIEF MALARIA OFFICE BIHAR SWASTHYA
                  BHAWAN, SULTANGANJ, PATNA
                                        -----------

3 14/12/2010 Petitioners are the persons who were terminated

for being illegally appointed.

An enquiry committee set up way back in the

year 2003 has not rendered its opinion. Petitioners do

accept the position that no report has been submitted as
-2-

yet. Therefore, their fate is not being decided.

If that is the position, then the petitioners have to

wait for the outcome of the enquiry report but the

enquiry committee will be also well advised to expedite

the matter because it is an old matter which is being

dragged on for many a years.

This writ application is disposed of with the

above observation.

AMIN/                   (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)