IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 12621 of 2007(C)
1. C.I.ABRAHAM, POOVELIL, POONJAR P.O.
... Petitioner
Vs
1. POONJAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
... Respondent
2. P.R.GOPINATHAN, PULIYALLIL HOUSE,
3. P.L.JOB, S/O.P.K.LUKOSE,
For Petitioner :SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM
For Respondent :SRI.K.G.ANIL BABU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
Dated :17/03/2008
O R D E R
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.
=======================
W.P.(C)NOS. 2956 OF 2005 & 12621 & OF 2007
========================
DATED THIS THE 17th day of March 2008
JUDGMENT
A copy of the decision taken by the Poonjar Grama Panchayath
as decision No. VII(1) dated 23-2-2008 is shown to me by the learned
counsel for the Panchayath. This copy of the decision will be placed on
record in the case. In view of the above decision, both these writ
petitions are disposed of in the light of that decision.
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE
ks
CRMC -2-
Mr.P.B.Suresh Kumar enters appearance for the 2nd respondent.
Mr.T.M.Chandran enters appearance for the first respondent company,
which sought to be liquidated. Mr. Chandran seeks time for filing
counter. Mr.Suresh Kumar submits that there has been subsequent
development to the institution of the company petition. The first
respondent company has approached the 2nd respondent Bank for a
settlement of the entire liability and have already paid Rs.1.5 crores
and has assured to liquidate the entire liability by 29th June 2008.
Mr.Chandran submits that till such time as counter is filed by the first
respondent, the first respondent will not alienate the property which
is described in Annexure-4. The above submission is recorded and in
view of the above submission, there will be an order restraining the
first respondent company from alienating the property in question for
a period of two weeks.
Post on 7-2-2008.
ks.