High Court Karnataka High Court

Mr Vikas Kumar Singh vs Secretary on 30 August, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Mr Vikas Kumar Singh vs Secretary on 30 August, 2010
Author: V.G.Sabhahit And K.Govindarajulu
- 1 _
§N THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

I

DATED THIS THE 307" DAY OF AUGUST 2010

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR.JUS'l"ICE V.G.SABHAHIfl.'__"4'   A.

AND

THE HONBLE MRJUSTZCE K.:=;}6vIArDARAJfiLI_j   

wan' PETITION (HABEAS CORI5US§'1$iD. 14%/_Ago,m ~  

BETWEEN:

MR VIKAS KUMAR SINGH  _

II No.15, L0'I'rEGOI.LAHALI_.L ' V
RAILWAY COLONY   '
MLALAYOUT,  ._ ;'  _  - 
BANGALORE.      . ._~-__....=..PE'I'I'['IONER

{SUO    
AND; D 4'

1. 4;SECRE'I'AI2y,"'
 "DEPAR_TMENT.0F'HOME
 "VIDI;yx_NA SOUDHA.
 "--VM;s.}3U1LD«ING ,
 

2  2. D"~«.__CQIvL'-![;AI£3$IONER OF POLICE

BANGALORE CITY

 n T BA1\EGAI.ORE.

D   =  :"1Ns1>Ec':'oR OF POLICE

SANJAYNAGAR POLICE STATION.
SANJAYNAGAR.  RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.E.S.INDiRESH, HCGP)

TELEGRAM SENT BY MRVIKAS KUMAR SINGH
FRIEND OF MRDEEPAK SHARMA IS TREATED AS A

I

HABEAS CORPUS PETITION AND REGD. U/A 226 OF THE
CONS’I’I’I’UTION OF INDIA TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
CORPUS DIREUFING THE RESPONDENTS ‘§’O PRODUCE

MRDEEPAK SHARMA BEFORE THIS HON’BLE c.Qt3R’r”

PERSON FORTHVVITH.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR “I:’iJE.’§l’l.’_-‘».VVl’?)2’&.’§*.’. it

V.G.SABHAHIT J., MADE THE FOLLOWING; j; ~

“1

This suo motu petition “been re.g’is;tered,f§on the
basis of the letter addressed Justice by
one Mr.Vikas Ktiriiar s§n’gh– police have
arrested Deepalt and has been
lllegally r . ‘ .

2.Vz’-Nlotice ..-to the respondents. The

Inspector of §7o1ice,lSanj–ayi1o.gar Police station is not present

“befo~ié”:’ Q0Urt;” “‘~S-ub~In5pector of Police. sarljaynagar

Poliicé’Sfatio$i’lisVp.resent. The person who had sent the letter

tolltbedlflonile flhief Justice by fax, Mr.Vikas Kumar Singh

allsothev person alleged to have been detained by police,

A Shanna, are present before the Court. It is

‘ stibrriitted by the petitioner that Deepak Shanna has come

S’ “beck and is not under illegal custody. ,

Wfi

3. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of, as there is

no illegai detention. However, call for explanation fro1n~.fiie

Inspector of Police, Sanjaynagar Police Statfon _

is not present in person when he wasmnotifier§”to* p’res’eni; ‘ ” =

before this Court in person. The it

put up before this Court for.»ta1_§;ing Vi’az;*ti”2er

matter.

iu.:°ige

Nd/v~