High Court Kerala High Court

Sree Narayana Traders And … vs V.C.Krishnan Achari on 6 June, 2007

Kerala High Court
Sree Narayana Traders And … vs V.C.Krishnan Achari on 6 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP No. 28485 of 2002(N)


1. SREE NARAYANA TRADERS AND FINANCIERS LTD
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. V.C.KRISHNAN ACHARI, USHA BHAVAN,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SUNIL JACOB JOSE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

 Dated :06/06/2007

 O R D E R
                             PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

                  ..........................................................

                               O.P.No.28485 OF 2002

                  ...........................................................

                       DATED THIS THE 6TH JUNE, 2007


                                   J U D G M E N T

It is reported by the Registry that the respondent is no more.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though notice

which was issued to the respondent has been returned with the

endorsement that the respondent is no more, according to his

information, the respondent is very much alive and kicking and is

regularly appearing before the court below.

2. I do not propose to go into the above controversy. The fact

remains that during the past five years the respondent has not been

served and the proceedings in the court below are under stay. The

petitioner-Company’s claim is that the petitioner is a creditor of the

respondent who has obtained decree in L.A.R.No.1 of 1993 on the file

of the Sub Court, Pathanamthitta. According to the petitioner-

Company, the Company has filed an application for attachment and

even as the same is pending, the learned Sub Judge is executing the

decree in the above L.A.R. and is going to disburse the amount under

deposit to the respondent. The respondent who has obviously been

informed about the passage of stay by this Court does not appear to

be enthusiastic in entering appearance before this Court and get the

OP.N0.28485/02

-2-

stay vacated.

3. Under these circumstances, I am of the view that this Original

Petition can be disposed of even without completing service on the

respondent or his legal heirs, if he is no more as reported by the

Registry. If no orders have so far been passed by the execution court

in the application filed by the petitioner seeking attachment of the

decree amount in L.A.R.1 of 1993, the court will pass orders on that

application after hearing both sides at the earliest and at any rate

within three weeks of receiving copy of this judgment. The court

below will pass orders on the cheque application, if any, filed for

withdrawal/disbursement of the amount under deposit, only after two

weeks of passage of orders in the attachment application.

The Original Petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)

tgl

OP.N0.28485/02

-3-

OP.N0.28485/02

-4-