High Court Kerala High Court

K.Prabhakaran vs T.V.Babu on 10 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
K.Prabhakaran vs T.V.Babu on 10 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1217 of 2008()


1. K.PRABHAKARAN,S/O.APPU,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. T.V.BABU,S/O.GOVINDAN NAIR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOSE KURIAKOSE (VILANGATTIL)

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.JACOB MURICKAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :10/02/2010

 O R D E R
                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
                  ...........................................
                  M.A.C.A.No.1217 OF 2008
                 .............................................
           Dated this the 10th day of February, 2010.

                        J U D G M E N T

This is an appeal preferred against the award of the

Claims Tribunal, Kozhikode in OP(MV)No.481/2001. The

claimant, a 51 year old man, sustained injuries in a road

accident and the Tribunal has awarded him a compensation

of Rs.27,500/=. Dissatisfied with the same, he has come up

in appeal for enhancement.

2. Heard. A perusal of the award would reveal that the

claimant has sustained a fracture of the clavicle and there

was diffused orbital odema. The C.T. Scan did not reveal any

serious problem. The Tribunal did not find any materials in

relation to fracture of the zygoma. The claimant was aged

51 years at the time of the accident and the accident took

place in the year 2000. It may not be on the higher side if

the income is fixed at Rs.2000/= and for three months actual

loss of earnings when it is calculated at the rate of Rs.2,000/=

the claimant will be entitled to an additional compensation

of Rs.1,500/=. The claimant was inpatient in a hospital for 17

: 2 :
M.A.C.A.No.1217 OF 2008

days and at the rate of Rs.100/=, he is entitled to Rs.1,700/=

of which only Rs.1,000/= is seen paid and therefore he is

entitled to balance of Rs.700/= as compensation. Fracture

of clavicle at the age of 51 would cause problems when

one has to do manual works and certainly there would have

been temporary disability and loss of amenities and

enjoyment on account of the odema as well as facial injury

to zygoma. Taking into consideration all these aspects, I am

inclined to grant Rs.3,000/= more towards loss of amenities

and enjoyment thereby entitling the claimant to have an

additional compensation of Rs.5,200/=.

In the result the MACA is partly allowed and the

claimant is awarded an additional compensation of Rs.5,200/=

with 8% interest on the said sum from the date of petition till

realisation and the respondent insurance company is directed

to deposit the said amount within a period of 60 days from

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Disposed of accordingly.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE
cl

: 3 :
M.A.C.A.No.1217 OF 2008

: 4 :
M.A.C.A.No.1217 OF 2008