Shafiulla S/O Mohinddin Sab vs Shabir Ahamed S/O Wahab Khan on 4 August, 2009

PvI.F,A*NO.536/'E606

IN THE H113}! COURT 0? KARJSIATAKA AT 

DATED THIS was 4"! mm; or AUGUST 2099   u H

PRESENT

THE xazowuzm mas. JUSTICE ngmwng {:1-i_,is*.u:f;15;=I,::v;§}:   

THE I-IQWBLE MR. JUsT1cE'T'B_';sRE$R1VirAsE'§£é'§u'*::r,e. 
M.F.A.No.536j;2,g_9,;§_? %%   
BETWEEN: '  '   V. 

1 SHAFIULLA S,/Q MOHINDDIN SAB ' '
AGED ABom:i_1*;v._YRs;'  _  - 
SINCE MIN€,iR  3*: H:s'M0*mE1:e'/ 

NATURA1.A«--£3i;I£. F;'l}_3;E;_AN s';»._afr ZAI --..*:*1~:u MEI

wzo Mcarzmm SR8»    

mo 01,11) :va::<3:s:1:iENn_r3:R * *

NO'66"H@-U33 OVE%I*'NI3}R~_ 

EE<;§WA_N.A.J;}3E.J§)CK   . .

§\lI:?3.£U?2, z<2;31:+UR sAm;:;3,Mzs__s;;1_D

(Z%{)USi.§.NA{3AR,  V  

MYSORE, ' _ _  "   APPELLANT

 (BY 31%;; *1?' NAR;§MifRA :P;§:AsAn, ADV}

j   

1 '-- A SHABIR 33;§~I1§;iviE3D S/O WAHAB KHAN
EjA"i' .N~€3_.:;3..325/52, 3RD CROSS
Arsaceuwnz ROAD 12 29:35 was
MYSQEEE;

A  A, VTLSERDAR Pasm. sjo ABDUL WAHEB

V ' '§'£;ED ABOUT 35 YRS
; ma? m~:«:;.2245 19TH WEST' moss
 ASHOKA ROAD
msmg MQHALLA
EvI'fSORE



_ 2 -
M.F.A.NO..§36/2006

3 THE NAT1ON'AL INSURANCE CO LTD 
NEAR RAMASWAMY CHRCLE, MYSORE  RESPONSE?-NFS

(R2 35 R3 SERVES)

THES MFA FILED U,/S 173(1) 015' NW ACT AGA£N3?.T'E{E' 
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATEDQ8/O9/2005  
N03?/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE LEAR-N'ED--:IU}Z{GE_,,. COU.?i'F"O.F 
SMALL CAUSES 85 ADDL. MACT, MYSORE,.PA.R'FLY ,A'r.-.LC5J¥'lN{3s
THE CLAIM PE'I'I'I'i{)N FOR' COMPENiE§A'F.3_ON AND' 

ENHANCEMENT OF' COMPENSATION.

T}-HS MFA COMING ore  HEAI§'II_§i(3, 'I'HVi'a'3 "bay,
MANJULA CHELLUR J, DELIVERED THE 1rQLL0w;.:~1_<;: ii

  

The appeiiaiitv 1'31  when he
met with an    1.00 pm.
when he   road from his
hcuse.   petition, a goods van

coming at at  Spécd »i:i"'_3 rash anti negligent manner

__d1'ive11_§ 1'3f;: alts diam-{.:f dashed against him. He sustained

 %  right arm, right leg, right sheulder

   on the right side. It is further

 V -;:o1:1te'£ic:¢,{i :1?:.%t t;he.iI1ju1'ie:s sustaineé by the appeilant

 "  L§'1e._.Aa.{i{:ident resuited in permanent disability {mm

H»   his day ta day life anti a}so ta dc: any avocation.

    The Tribunai, I10 doubt hald that tht: driver of the

van was resmnsible for the accident, hcawevsr granted



_ 3 _
M.F.A.NO.536/2006

Rs. 10,000] - far fracture sf Scaptzla ané Rs.2,0£'):h(5,l.~

towarcis medical expenses. He was further ;'atw;;:'gitié:i_.__ A' 

Rs.4»6'7'/- tawards loss of income far 7'   V'  9 

Rs. 12,457/-- was awarded. Thougr;{ th¢ §a%f(A:1ind [ J 7

was marked as Ex.P--5, we ::1¢:3t¢3__.  

of the 'I'1*ibunai has stated thaflf Wfiliiifi  of
any sort is marked.    X-Ray
No.2639 dated 3.3,2003%:1;s§c:os§é;§: scapula en
thfi fight Sh  '     .. 

3.    facts, we are cf the
epirzion  t':h€:;:V':é:   sf mind at all on the

part of the  'Fassessing the conxpensatizizrx.

"We  oi" A the?' 'tgyiiiion that the matter needs

r¢exa__1:E1ixia¥;i:1;¥i' .,_éi'.. the facts ta arrive at the right

  {:0¥1C}.§1Si011.'TVrd€r to award just arid reasonable

 '»-'«._C€)I1:£pt"3I'1*.'s£?1}Ti(}IZ£. U'nc¥er {base circumst.ar1ct:s, we are af

   that the appeal deaexves to be alieweé.

"  Accordifiglya this judgnent and award dated

4 28.9.2

(‘)O:”:”i passed by the Tribunai iH_M.V.C.NO.7/2004

are setasiée ané {ha matter is remitteti ta iihfi “I’ribu21a;i

Ivi.F’.A.NO.536/2006
for flesh disposal} on merits. However, the
appel}an1:/ claimant is entitied to leaé furt}:1er evidence, if

agriy, including medical axperts’ evidencxe.

5. The parties are diI'(‘.:CiZ€d to appear ~

Tribunal on 13* September 2009. T1_fJ$..§?S?_h0Ifi

:9 be compieted within three W

rticeipt of the records.

6. We also make it the an

the actionable ;1egV1é.genc<A:V_g3f 'fhfl van, there:

is no Ilfiffid :91 The Tribunal shall

dispose t_'.hev ' .« only with regard to

_ vq1Aia}'1¥L1_§:i}'3:i af (:oni'pr:i3Sa£i§Jn.

Sd/-

ESKELEGE

gm

é._.f 5′

é 2 .;;.s..;a