High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Md. Tabrej vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Md. Tabrej vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Criminal Miscellaneous No.28447 of 2011
                             Md. Tabrej, S/o Md. Khalique.
                                         Versus
                                   The State of Bihar
                                     -----------------

02. 30.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case is that the petitioner and

co-accused Md. Irshad kidnapped the daughter of the

informant. During investigation the victim was recovered

and she gave statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. but did

not allege any sexual assault upon herself by the accused

persons.

Considering the same, let the petitioner, above

named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to

the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani

in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 177 of 2011

(G.R. No. 1607 of 2011) subject to the following

conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The

bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is
2

any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the

affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an

accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be

released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature

after his release in the present case and thereafter the

court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the

police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable

to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-