G Rathna @ Nagarathna vs Sardar on 9 December, 2010

3.11333.’ ..§}:E.§’GR FINAL Emma “mm mm’,

*A by the nlaimant is diracbad against the

_j£§.:igmm1V”.’ < dateé msmoos passea in

1999 on tim file of I Edél. Civil Judge

"X(%.<"I§I:'V.'I@'1'11iA.} & mew, Mysore, {far short, Tribmml') for

of mgnsatbn on the gmund that fix

g®mpe:nsat:'ac:n sf Rs. 1,90.00${- with fintzrreat at 6% per

/'

% M

/

sssmum, awarcled in favour of the claims}: as

thm} claim ::1fi'~'-ia.12,3G,§fi/-, is inadequate. __ '

2. The brief facts 9:’ the cage

amuant ‘us the wife af

Vmlmgwda and *

the aweasaa. He was hale: the
accfient. He diet}. .”‘°m’dent that
wcurmd at about When Im
was
r§§.%:{;a[e’«3~9i an 121% mi: aid: of the mad
siowly ;v;11aga, at that time, the

mm Ha. Kn-94,1570? arm
_ a rash and ޣ manner fram

rm; spam} and hit; agama: the

25.’ fiefl dawn wrth’ mad axfi dieri on

* ‘spat? Thc fizrthm: mm af thsa awlmnt is that the:

was aged about 30 years. at the time 9f the

144″}§{:sc’misnt and was daing micmalra 85 mama we-rk aml.

geflkg morrthly income ofRs.18,E)U0/’-. He has the only

Earmd.-earrmr En and an aeacaunt asf rim
5 “KM

untwly azicath of the; cimeasad, ciaimzt sufifirad

saciallgr anti Hence the

mpemem 3 & 4 ham med me czasm p¢:i:;:;$¢z%%’::.ua;¢:+

Se<::t?m:t1 156 af tlm Motor Vehfiieg' "'

Tribunal seekflg eampmzsatizizr; 1 ::-f; 18-

Rs.12,33,%Qf- agfinst the
md mm' af the nfi'ez1é3r'A.g 331d' ' 'biaimyv
had came up far Tribuml on

11f8}' gwcx. T1f1;% fI'rihu;§:i§1} ths relevant

matm-1% «aft.«:.~' of the ma}.
mil . ed €113 c1.a1:n' pet1t1:3' ' :1 in

mm, awezfing under c¥;ifi'm*ez1t

flaw the éata af gefiifim 12:31 the

Eahcxg diamtiafiad with the quantum cf

mmpe.' by the Triburml, the aygfiant ?n

hkefare 311$ Caurt, saaelcixxg enizajwemerxt G2'

3, We haw $1221 barnfi mange} fiat appellant

H. mfi the Gamma} fer rmpandent Nc.2-inaumr.

/
as»

2' MM"

#513

4. ‘% méfiputud fms cf me a:c:/asa ax:

& of awnideni that rmtzlmé in the

dwmea. mm it Q mat in disputg *

3%? ywm at the tim af
‘ & mmcn. work. 3,-a

and aectzpairkan, we fit ai
mg dmmsesé at Ra.:,25e;-
pm. asaawaw rm safi mm,
IE3″? is m be axpmm
mm dfiucizim xwa mm
Rs.3%,@m;«~; ma gm ta Rs,2,om;- per
fxgtlae age of mg deemed, rm

% ” W as pat the deafiéon of the

%*%aa;;%a2e saw: at Mia in Sula vm.=. mun:
% amr.129a.; mam, thehsa af
mm mat 2:; RaA,m,em;- gm. Ra.2,9m;-

V55: 3323 gs.1,m,sm;- mwardefi by :1»

;?1’>§z.2aal.,

5. Furthm, aha Trfifi 3139 awed $33 mt
awdjrg aampmatébn tawardzs Imus of astaias.

2%»

‘fhereferae, having mard tn the faets and

sf tfm m, we award 3. sum :21?

1953 at’ aatam.

6, Hawrcxlet, a sum, sf

tnwarda 1035 cf lave 85 –
awaramt rewards has as? Rs.:9,ow/-

awarded fies
are just arid *V?:;a;§lBt;cr interfarmzcssi
circumastanm of
2211:: fiim by appellant
is anaysga jzzdgmexit and award
‘ad in M.V.€.Ha. 532! 1%? an the

‘t1§g2:_:f ;«%;::a§:11;_:3ivi1 Judge gs:-.::>n.; & mar, hiiyuareg

is awarding a sum ef RaA,43,QfiOf – as

g;m.,9e,cm;- awarcied by the Tribunal, with

r at 6% pm ammm an the enhanced

% gr Ra.g2§53,om;~ fiem the am af petition

% the date of marmtion, The 1ma.1c–u.p is as fallows;

/
73/

Tawards Loss cf De R3. ”

Tawards Lesa af love and afiectian Rs.’ H % j, ‘A

Tawards Loss ofmtata
Tawarda less ofcemomlum ; Rsa V.

Tawards trazfipnrtatinn of
body and funeral axzpmtzsgs

Rafi iQ. C:fj@/-

The to fiepasit the
thwean at 6% per
ffém the data at’ we-aigpt of

mpy 9§_’

an suck: depaait by the Imurazzcaa

of the e’ mmpematiavn,

‘ V with paropnrtinnaha intermtg aha?) fie kept

“Fi:s§d f3epesit, 2n the: mm: (sf the appellant, in any
or Scifluiaad &nk$ for a period of Eve
and rcmabie M five yeam with iiberty zmmfsrafi

Jm inert» withdraw the persmtsmz imam: an the mid

alamsia 041
if

/