Jineesh vs The Station House Officer on 26 November, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 6746 of 2009()


1. JINEESH, S/O.THAMPAN, KAMPIYAKATH VEEDU,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. MADHU, S/O.THAMPAN, KAMPIYAKATH VEEDU,

                        Vs



1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.PRIYADARSAN THAMPI

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :26/11/2009

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                     ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 6746 of 2009
                 ------------------------------------
            Dated this the 26th day of November, 2009

                            O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section

438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are

accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.486/2009 of Alappuzha North

Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under

Sections 452, 294(b), 323 and 427 read with Section 34 of the

Indian Penal Code

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the

learned Public Prosecutor.

4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of

the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners.

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the

petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station shall

release them on bail on their executing bond for Rs. 10,000/-

each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the

satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following

conditions:

B.A. No. 6746 of 2009 2

A) The petitioners shall report before the
investigating officer between 9 A.M and 11
A.M. on alternate Mondays, till the final report
is filed or until further orders;

B) The petitioners shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

C) The petitioners shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

D) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

E) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

ln