IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 32188 of 2005(F)
1. THILAKAM.C.B., W/O.C.S.STHIYANESAN,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER,
... Respondent
2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS
3. SECRETARY,
4. SUPERINTENDENT, TALUK HEAD QUARTERS
For Petitioner :SRI.V.V.ASOKAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI
Dated :04/09/2007
O R D E R
V.GIRI,J.
-----------------------------------------
W.P.(C)NO.32188 of 2005
-----------------------------------------
Dated this the 4th day of August, 2007
JUDGMENT
The petitioner was appointed as Hospital Attendant Grade II on
provisional basis under Ext.P3 order. On expiry of the period, she was
terminated from service on 7.8.2004. On the premise that she had
continued in service for a period in excess of 13 months, she claimed
regularisation. She further contends that her termination itself is bad, in as
much as the order of termination is not served.
2. The claim for regularisation of service is not sustainable. The law in
this regard seems to be settled by the Supreme Court in the latest decision
reported in Secretary, State of Karnataka v Umadevi (2006(4) SCC(1).
3. The grievance of the petitioner, as regards the absence of an order
of termination of service, also seems to be misconceived as it stood
terminated on expiry of the period of temporary appointment.
In the result, there is no merit in the writ petition and the same is
dismissed.
V.GIRI, JUDGE
css
: :
: :