IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Mat.Appeal.No. 289 of 2006()
1. MANOJ ALIAS RAKESH,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. BINDU, D/O.SIVARAMAN,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI
Dated :17/08/2009
O R D E R
R. BASANT &
M.C. HARI RANI, JJ.
————————————————-
C.M.Appl.No.1812 of 2006 &
Mat. Appeal No. 289 of 2006
————————————————-
Dated this the 17th day of August, 2009
ORDER/JUDGMENT
Basant,J.
This appeal filed on 19/1/04 remains even now and the
last order is seen passed on 11/10/06. Re-presentation delay
was condoned and the appeal was directed to be numbered on
4/4/05. Thereafter, no orders have been passed.
2. Today, when the matter came up for admission, there
is no representation for the appellant. The challenge is
against a decree for divorce and it appears to us to be evident
that the appellant/petitioner is not now interested in
prosecuting this appeal. The impugned order granting divorce
has been passed as early as on 28/3/03.
3. The petition for condonation of delay of 65 days is, in
C.M.Appl.No.1812 of 2006 &
Mat. Appeal No. 289 of 2006 ]
-: 2 :-
these circumstances, dismissed as not prosecuted.
4. Consequently, Mat.Appeal No.289/06 shall stand
dismissed as barred by limitation.
Sd/-
R. BASANT
(Judge)
Sd/-
M.C. HARI RANI
(Judge)
Nan/
//True Copy//
P.S. to Judge
C.M.Appl.No.1812 of 2006 &
Mat. Appeal No. 289 of 2006 ]
-: 3 :-