The Assistant Executive Engineer vs Sri M H Thimmappa S/O M … on 4 March, 2010

W THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 4?" DAY 0? MARCH, 2010

PRESENT

THE HON'8LE MRJUSTICE K.sREEDHAR..R.AQ':'__'__:fr if 

&

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.NM?a$i'uL;o.iéA~:;AJ.§$oVéA(LDAJ 

WRIT APPEAL No,§445g"20d9 {L-T531 ~ =  '

BETWEEN:

1.

 D.Vija§kaw--.!<:;j__i:_T_Aa.r, Adv.)

The Assistant Execiitiye 
7" Minor, IrrEgati0n"'-Sub~L3iv?i.sE.on;--   'T 

P.W.D. Hangai, Moiaka-lmu'r','V _  
Taiuk & District ChitradLa.i'jga';.._"=.__ '

. The Seérefayry ft)'G.o§e;'riTment,

M.s'.-auiiding,'pjg.  .
Banga'i0_re as 560 

Pub.Iic:Wo.ri<"sv'D-epasrtmgént; '

IAPPELLANTS

   pa ,

Ageafd abVou_tfi-fi3 yea rs,
S/of Mfianumanthappa,

 Residénfof Chavalur,
 CIhal_|akere Taluk,
" _CE1_si_tfadurga District.

:RESPONDENT

-V



E"\)

This Writ appeal is filed u/S 4 of the Karnataka High
Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in Writ
Petition No.8588/2008 (L~TER) dated 15/06/2009.

This appeal coming on for preliminary hearing_j't.his.

day, K.SREEDHAR RAO J., delivered the following:_-:..__" » _    3

JUDGMENT

Respondent was working as Literate A’ssisitari.t4 tinder

15′ appellant from 17.2.1986 to ”

is removed from service. Inrefe’re_nceyV’the~.;Labojur
Court rejected the reference oni.~t-hiegv-ground of”d.ela.vy. The
learned Single Judge in’ in question

however found th_at.__resp’o’ndent for 240 days

and grainted”raiivf,|om:psum’,retren’ch’ment compensation of
Rs.50,00Ci-,f~’@ The”.o_i<de'r.._:app.ears to be a discretionary

order. __Henc"e, VVrlo_grou_nd""'for interference. The reason

"V"stated5*ioi;'.rJel.aAy inxfi'l'i'I'i'g"the appeal is also not convincing.

' : dismissed both on the ground of delay
and 'r}n'erits_r.'"Vli: W 1
EEGE

Sd/~