Rajesh V.K. vs University Of Calicut on 7 July, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 18891 of 2009(F)


1. RAJESH V.K.,BAMS STUDENT,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,
                       ...       Respondent

2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.SUGATHAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :07/07/2009

 O R D E R
                         V.GIRI, J.
               ---------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No.18891 of 2009
               ---------------------------
             Dated this the 7th day of July, 2009

                        JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a student of Vaidyaratnam

Ayurveda College, Ollur for Ayurvedacharya (B.A.M.S). The

college is affiliated to the Calicut University. The course

consists of three professional terms of 1= year duration each

and an internship of 1 year. As per the Regulations of the

University, a student can appear for the higher professional

examination only if he has passed in all the subjects of the

previous professional. The petitioner has passed in all the

subjects for the 1st professional examination. He had written

the 2nd professional examination conducted in January, 2008.

But, when the result was published, the petitioner were

declared failed in four papers. He appeared for the 2nd

professional supplementary examination conducted in July,

2008. He failed in two subjects for which he again appeared in

supplementary examination held in January, 2009. Again, he

failed in one paper. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks

obtained by him, he had applied for revaluation of the two

W.P.(C)No.18891 of 2009

:: 2 ::

papers viz., Dravya Guna Vijnanam and Rogavijnanam &

Vikritivijnanam. He is aggrieved that the results of the

revaluation have not been published so far.

2. I heard learned standing counsel for the

University also. There is no justification for the delay in the

publication of results of revaluation sought for by the

petitioner.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of

directing the respondent to publish the results of the

revaluation sought for by the petitioner, as early as possible,

at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the last date

for receipt of application for revaluation, provided the

application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct.

Sd/-

(V.GIRI)
Judge

sk/
//true copy//

P.S. to Judge