R Raveendrakumar @ Ravi S/O … vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 October, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 1873" DAY OF' OCTOBER, 2OIOfi--.._

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE c.R.KUMARASS79'Ab/:55   O'

CRIMINAL APPEAL No.16aAoF'2cpg§_'V"""'  4

Between:

1. R.Raveendrakumar @ Ravi
S/0 Raohappaji, O  _
Age: 38 years, occ:...B,usine~ss.;"-. " 
R/o D.No.I45, Vyragya iVIarg"2'1~,.__»_"=_
Siddarthanagar, Mysore.'  f   '

2. Shivakumar V .   - 
S/o Rachap'p:afi,',*  .;   A ' 
Age: 31 y_ea'--rs,5jVQ-oc*:Busi.ne~.ss..V
R/0 D.Nc5. l_/F5,' V'3rragyfia 'Nlargaf

Sid d a1f_t__lf1 an §1'ga:R,_ xMy'so'r"e;' ._  V  ,

3. R. Lorkesh   A .
S/0 R"ang._egowd«a";A "

Age: 29years;-.O'ec:I3i;:;f§i1;ess,
R/o D.N0';«{24v6, 2fid..vC1*.oss,
NaZ;d1"D_ad 1VEohaI1a,'Mysore.  Appellants

 «(By  Sh af'a.¢nappVéi""1\/Iattur. Advocate)

Afidi'-D"

x--_ . .

 The S"tat<:'.of'Karnataka

By Nanj.an.gu d

 Po1vi..o"e Station.  Respondent

O  {xBDy"S_rjifiB.Rajasubrahmanya Bhat, High Court

 -.f.GovernrnentP1eader)

=i<***=l=

Q



This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section
374 [2] of Code of Criminal Procedure against the
judgment dated 10.01.2006 passed by the 111
Additional Sessions Judge, Mysore in 
No.3<=13/03 convicting the appellants/accuseVdet.._'fo_r

the offences punishable under Sections 

341 read with Section 34 of Indian 

each accused is sentenced to paybfine.'o'fv?:5V0OVf--'--Ain__u 

default they shall undergo Sl. rg_;{¢n«¢ 

the offence punishable under Sef:__tio_r1 34.1'.,o'f.lndianivt'

Penal Code and further each"-...accu'sed. ist..vse:nte.n_ced
to suffer R}. for 2 years andsteo pay tfi'ne:to':f €2,000/--
in default of payrnenf1;~~..«'of_«ftitne accused shall
undergo R.I. for a  months for
the offence Punifihalfile-~ of Indian
Penal Code.        

Tlais  on for Orders this day,

the Court "made t'the.tf'o1l"e_vying: --
"' ggfiDGMENT

i,ii*rv:,.19;'--3-.r.'.311.__tudgfii'eri£.and ordet 'of
conviction     , dated
10.01.2006» passed» by  iI"Ii_ i§{'d.d'itiena1

Sejssi0l_nsl.f'V_..   _ -- Mysore in
S.t:..'NQ.34~.3/12.2003'.':'"-_ll'l.- the interest of

is

justice'.

 4. ,.'§i'lhe=proslecnitioni witnesses have stated in their

 at"i'i£iavi_t :tl1.aAt'--..at the intervention of the well wishers

and"l..__rel'alt'i.v_esiflllthey have compromised with the

l_appe'llants'<:'and have prayed to set aside the

l""v."*-jfudgmen't and order of conviction and sentence

"1's.1d'a_'ted"' 10.01.2005 passed by the 111 Additional

%/



Sessions

Case, Mysore in S.C.No.343/2003.

Accordingly, I pass the following:

(1)

(ii)

ORDER

This Criminal Appeal is dis,posed”‘o’f—-.:i’11,

of petition filed under Seotioii’3:2(j*,(‘2l

of Criminal Procedun-‘;_
The judgment and of c’on:V_ietiorn and
sentence date-tiff _ passed in

S.C.No.343./2003… ‘ C V Additional

Sessions: Case, plkiysoollfe isA._h’efe–i3y set aside.

(iii) Appella.nt_s;’p_V1 VaCq1i§Vitted of the offences

chjarged’ bonds stand cancelled.

355%

Z …..