Gujarat High Court High Court

Manpura vs State on 25 November, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Manpura vs State on 25 November, 2010
Author: M.R. Shah,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/14544/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 14544 of 2010
 

To


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 14548 of 2010
 

with


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 14549 of 2010
 

To


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 14569 of
2010 
=========================================================

 

MANPURA
PATELVAS (UN)SEVA SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 3 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
DIPEN A DESAI for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR. JANAK RAVAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2 -
4. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

				Date
: 10/11/2010 

 

ORAL
ORDER

1. As
all these petitions are filed on apprehension, they are not
entertained at this stage without further entering into the merits of
the case and even expressing anything on merits with respect to
mala-fides and/or the apprehension on the part of the petitioners.

2. Mr.

Dipen Desai, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respective
petitioners has submitted that the hearing of all the Suo-motu
Revision Applications are kept today and the Authority will even give
the copy of the order tomorrow just before few minutes of holding of
the election so as to restrain the respective societies from casting
their votes and participating in the election process and even
petitioners shall not be given sufficient time to challenge the
order, if any adverse order, is passed against them. Therefore, while
dismissing theses petitions, it is observed and directed to the
appropriate Authority that if any adverse order is passed against the
petitioners, in that case, a copy of the order shall be made
available to the respective petitioners and/or their advocate/s
immediately. It will be open for the respective petitioners to
request the concerned Authority to suspend the order that may be
passed against the petitioners, if the same is adverse, so as to
enable them to challenge the same before the appropriate higher
forum, and as and when such a request is made, the same be considered
by the appropriate Authority before whom the proceedings are pending.

With
these observations, all these petitions are dismissed. No costs.

Direct
Service is permitted.

(M.R.SHAH, J.)

Safir*

   

Top