IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MACA.No. 1658 of 2007()
1. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. K.S.SUBHAGAN, KAYILPARAMBIL HOUSE,
... Respondent
2. GOPU AGED 15 YEARS,S/O..SUBHAGAN,
3. GOKUL AGED 8 YEARS,S/O.SUBHAGAN,
4. V.G.SHIBU,S/O.GOPALAN,
5. V.G.SAGIRMON,S/O.GOPALAN,
For Petitioner :SRI.KKM.SHERIF
For Respondent :SRI.K.RAMANATHAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI
Dated :24/11/2010
O R D E R
A.K. Basheer & P.Q. Barkath Ali, JJ.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
MACA. 1658 of 2007-D
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Dated this the 24th day of November, 2010
Judgment
Basheer, J:
Appellant-Insurance Company has preferred this
appeal impugning the award passed by the Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal primarily on the ground that the
Tribunal was not justified in directing the appellant to
indemnify the owner of the offending vehicle, since the
policy issued by the appellant did not cover the risk of a
pillion rider.
2. However when the appeal is taken up for
consideration it is fairly conceded by learned counsel for
the appellant that in view of the clarification issued by the
Insurance Regulatory Development Authority, a package
policy will also cover the risk of a pillion rider. In that
view of the matter the challenge raised by the appellant
against the award cannot be sustained.
The appeal fails and it is accordingly dismissed.
A.K. Basheer
Judge.
P.Q. Barkath Ali
Judge.
an.