High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Kurukshetra University vs M/S Shiv Construction And Others on 12 October, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Kurukshetra University vs M/S Shiv Construction And Others on 12 October, 2009
LPA No.926 of 2009                                        #1#

     IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
                 HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH


                                             LPA No.926 of 2009

                                      Date of Order: 12.10.2009

Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra

                                                          ...Petitioner

                                   Versus

M/s Shiv Construction and others

                                                          ....Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH

Present: Mr. S.C. Sibal, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. V.S. Rana, Advocate for the appellant.

1. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

M.M. KUMAR,J

This appeal filed under clause X of the letters patent is directed

against judgment dated 30.3.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge of this

Court in CWP No.17322 of 2008. The challenge in the aforesaid petition is

to order dated 24.10.2007 whereby arbitration proceedings pending before

Arbitrator-respondent No.2 were abruptly closed. Learned Single Judge

after recording the clauses of arbitration agreement has opined that the order

closing the proceedings cannot be sustained and the same has been set aside

with a direction to the University to nominate a new Arbitrator, as per the

clauses of the agreement. It was further directed that the Arbitrator shall

proceed further with the arbitration proceedings from the stage the earlier
LPA No.926 of 2009 #2#

Arbitrator had left with an advance notice to the petitioners.

The aforesaid direction issued by the learned Single Judge has

been complied with as per order dated 7.10.2009 passed by the Kurukshetra

University and now the Successor of the earlier Arbitrator has been

appointed as an Arbitrator. As the order has been complied with, no

argument has been addressed with regard to the legality of the order passed

by the learned Single Judge.

Appeal fails and the same is dismissed as having been rendered

infructuous.


                                                   ( M.M. KUMAR )
                                                        JUDGE




October 12, 2009                                    ( JASWANT SINGH )
manoj                                                     JUDGE