IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 36626 of 2010(C)
1. SANTHOSH B.NAIR,MANAGING DIRECTOR,
... Petitioner
2. MRS.PREMEELA.V.S,KARTHIKA,AHLATHAPURAM,
Vs
1. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR,AIRPORT AUTHORITY
... Respondent
2. THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR,TRIVANDRUM AIRPORT,
For Petitioner :SRI.JIJO PAUL
For Respondent :SRI.K.L.NARASIMHAN, SC, TVM AIRPORT ATY
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :03/01/2011
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.36626 OF 2010(C)
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2011
J U D G M E N T
Inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent on Exts.P1 and P2
complaints made by the petitioner alleging irregularities is what is
complained of in this writ petition.
2. Standing counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2
submits that, on receipt of Exts.P1 and P2, the 2nd respondent has
forwarded the complaints to an Inhouse Committee, which has
been constituted for the purpose of examination of complaints in
the nature of Exts.P1 and P2. It is stated that report of the
committee is awaited and that on receipt of the report necessary
action in the matter will be taken in the matter.
3. From the submissions made by the Standing Counsel for
the respondents, it is obvious that the allegation of inaction on
the complaints made by the petitioner, based on which this writ
petition is filed, is factually incorrect. Since the matter is now
pending examination of the Inhouse Committee that is constituted
by the respondents, all that is necessary is that the second
respondent should ensure that the Committee examines the
WPC.No. 36626/2010
:2 :
matter expeditiously and on receipt of its report further action
based on the report will be taken. There will be an order to that
effect.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
(ANTONY DOMINIC)
JUDGE
vi/