M/S.Kallahal And Brothers vs State Of Karnataka on 9 July, 2009

EN THE HIGH couar as ;<AR:~4ATAa<A T % 

cxacurr EENCH AT DHARWAD.     n

DATED THIS THE 9"' DAYf:A'0F .':! Ui;Y}'_2€3§2IS¥_.: =  

savage

THE Hmzme MR. JusT1cé"irT:k;ire. NAG;fi.§4'Cfi¥="§A¥\§ v!?A$

wR.i:T Pfi§TITI#§§\I*~.N0.;§4$:3'##.£'g§;g9{AP§4VC} V

BETWEEN:

M/S KALLAHAL      
REPRESENTED; B'?'_~1TS$v- 1?ART§s§a_    
SQMALINGAPEE   ' A   ._ 
s/0 aA5AP¥:A -i-(.§ei,.LAi-¥if;;5'<%.,  

AGE: 58 '{EA§?.S_. C.CC_:BU£=.1f~i-E_SS ;
RIO No.23,' APMC .vARD,     

GABAG, ....PETITIONER

\V '(av 59.1%, mnssa aa:§:{DE3%Aa, ADV.)

  1. S§'}i51TEVV'C§§5--.V--'KA¥'§§é;%TA§<A

_ BE'?fi:R'§'?4$;h§*T er-' Cfl~O-PERATTGN
. Ms. B-U;i._i.D-I1';%G,

  ma. Amasama VEEDI,
" «    sam;As_9a§- 559091.

"   kins maacrca o:= ¥5éARi<ETIf\i-G,

"  '!\}0.16,2"° RA3B;~;AvA:~; RGAS,
BA¥siGALGRE-G1.

gkw



ORDER.

The ferfeiture order/notice whic:_h....is__imp--{i%§ti'e.ti"_';v§f'i'i!fi_'i$ ix}-i"t~ _ 

petitions are kept in ebeyance for a ;§<,=-.irEc;2'_di  

this éate. The eetiticner shaft  ant'a;:ip:ica%2i§iiVw.i,fev2:Hsrinctiuri'

of the pian for the shop to fee conAV$t.i:§§:fte£i»_»in  Veaiiiotted to it
within a period of five  The respondent

authorities APMC shaii “e§pv’i.i:tiation flied by the
petitiener for with law within five
weeks ‘£heVvi’e3fié¥fi;;V”. petijtieiieflr’s¥:a–i’E’§construct the shop on the
site aEietteéd_At’o’_it’ pessibie but not Later than

the meter ¥imit’-«sf «.=£>Vm;:4i’eteci:’i;vithin a period of nine months, the erder/notice

impiiefied ‘vii§i–“.”tfti3V§§Vcwrit petitien relating ta forfeiture revives

m;ter:3auti:as’i%9;v end the site wouid be ferfeiteci by the APMC. it ie

s-}jadAe’ic!ea?V”that this ereer enures ta the benefit of the petitieriei”

7″v”*””

Three weeks’ time is granted te tha Eear§:§:i§_:”.§Co'{£.¥f§L:%ef.i

Maiiikarjun C. Basarecidy to fife i1isV>AA»§.{a§<aia2':;'i'1'*v*§(i';=?:'t§ie'~_ti'z§§'d" *

reweradent.

. . ‘ . ‘I W