IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.18125 of 2008
OM PRAKASH AGRAWAL & ANR
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and
the State.
A supplementary affidavit has been filed on
behalf of the petitioner stating therein to the effect that
after the impugned order the Court below has framed the
charges on 12th April, 2010, however, no witness has been
examined after the framing of the charges.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the
prayer of the petitioner that no offence is made out under
sections 103 & 104 of the Trade & Merchandise Act, the
matter is before the trial Court for consideration and if
need be there is also provision for altering the charge.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case as also the impugned order and further development
that the charge has been framed, it will be open for the
petitioner, if so advised, to make proper application with
regard to his grievances that no offence is made out under
sections 103 & 104 of the Trade & Merchandise Act.
The writ application accordingly stands disposed
of.
Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)