IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RP.No. 884 of 2003()
1. KUTTAN (S/O. KURIYAKKOOT VELUKUTTY),
... Petitioner
Vs
1. STANDARD INVESTMENTS, TRICHUR,
... Respondent
2. MUKUNDAN (S/O. KURIYAKKOOTT KUTTAN),
3. RADHAKRISHNAN (S/O.KUTTALA VELAYUDHAN),
4. LAKSHMI (W/O. KURIYAKKOT KUTTAN),
For Petitioner :SRI.V.JAYAKUMAR
For Respondent :SRI.K.PADMANABHAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN
Dated :20/07/2009
O R D E R
A.K.BASHEER & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ.
== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Review Petition No.884 of 2003.
in
R.F.A.No.94 of 2003.
= = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 20th day of July, 2009.
O R D E R
Basheer, J.
This review petition is at the instance of the appellant in
RFA.No.94/2003 which was disposed of on October 3, 2003.
2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this
Court had committed grave error in disposing of the appeal without
adverting to various contentions raised by the petitioner/appellant
especially the one relating to novation of contract. We are afraid the above
contention is wholly untenable. The appeal was disposed of after
considering the relevant materials available on record and after hearing the
learned counsel for the parties. At this distance of time, it will not be open
to the petitioner to urge before us that his contentions were not considered.
Review Petition No.884/2003.
-: 2 :-
We have perused the grounds raised by the petitioner in the memorandum of
review petition. The scope of review is admittedly very limited and narrow.
The appellant cannot be allowed to argue the appeal yet again in the guise
of a review petition.
There is no merit in any of the contentions raised in the review
petition. Therefore, it is dismissed.
A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE .
P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE.
Kvs/-