Chetansinh vs Chairman on 28 February, 2011

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

LPA/618/2010	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 618 of 2010
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 11600 of 2008
 

=========================================


 

CHETANSINH
GHANUBHA JADEJA - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

CHAIRMAN
/ MANAGING DIRECTOR, DENA BANK HEAD OFFICE & 3 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
PH PATHAK for the Appellant. 
MR.VARUN K.PATEL for the
Respondents. 
========================================= 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 28/02/2011 

 

 
 
					ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)

Learned
counsel for the appellant is allowed four weeks’ time to file
supplementary affidavit explaining as to why other persons have been
appointed when they have applied under the old scheme and when new
scheme has come into force and why the appellant has been appointed
though he has applied for old scheme. The entire material will be
supplied with the affidavit.

(V.M.Sahai,J)

(G.B.Shah,J)

***vcdarji

Top