High Court Kerala High Court

Rajesh Aged 29 Years vs State Of Kerala on 2 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Rajesh Aged 29 Years vs State Of Kerala on 2 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 6398 of 2009()


1. RAJESH AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. JOSEPH,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :02/11/2009

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                     ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 6398 of 2009
                 ------------------------------------
             Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2009


                            O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section

438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is accused

No.1 in Crime No.110/2003 of Vadakkekara Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under

Sections 143, 147, 448 and 427 read with Section 149 of the

Indian Penal Code.

3. The aforesaid offences are bailable.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner

that charge sheet was filed on 20.08.2003. After taking

cognizance, the case was numbered as C. C. No.156/2004 on

the file of the court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, North

Paravur.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

the petitioner was employed abroad. He did not receive any

summons. Due to non appearance, non bailable warrant was

issued against the petitioner. The petitioner apprehends arrest

in execution of the non bailable warrant.

B.A. No. 6398 of 2009 2

6. In Vineeth Simarajan @ Ambadi Vs. State of

Kerala 2009(3) KLT 576, It was held that when a non

bailable warrant is issued by a court, the remedy of the

accused is not to apply for Anticipatory Bail but to appear

before the court which issued the non bailable warrant and to

apply for withdrawing the warrant and for the grant of bail. It

was also held that when such an application is filed, the court

which issued the warrant shall consider the same in the light

of principles laid down in Biju Vs. state of Kerala 2007 (2)

KLT 280.

Reserving the right of the petitioner to apply for Regular

Bail and for recalling the warrant as stated above, the bail

application is closed.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

ln