High Court Kerala High Court

Jayakumar vs The Authorized Officer on 6 April, 2009

Kerala High Court
Jayakumar vs The Authorized Officer on 6 April, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 8648 of 2009(A)


1. JAYAKUMAR,AGED 48 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, CHIEF
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.S.DILIP

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :06/04/2009

 O R D E R
            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
                   -------------------------------------------
                    W.P(C).No.8648 OF 2009
                   -------------------------------------------
                Dated this the 6th day of April, 2009


                               JUDGMENT

The petitioner, now aged 48 years going by the affidavit, is

an ex-service man. He availed a loan in connection with an

activity in hollow bricks. The loan was not repaid. The bank

filed a suit and obtained a decree. On the strength of that

decree, the bank has initiated action under the SARFESI Act.

There is no jurisdictional error or legal infirmity in the impugned

proceedings. Since the amount due is in terms of the decree, the

quantification of the amount sought to be recovered under the

SARFESI Act is beyond challenge. The total accruals by now is

around Rupees Five Lakhs. In terms of the interim orders, an

amount of Rs.50,000/- has been paid. Taking that also into

consideration, it is directed that if the petitioner remits amounts

at the rate of Rs.50,000/- per month, payable on or before the

10th of every month commencing from May, 2009, the impugned

distress action will be deferred and ultimately dropped.

However, if there is default in remitting any of the instalments as

WPC.8648/09

Page numbers

aforesaid, the benefit of this judgment will stand recalled

automatically and distress action will follow. The writ petition is

ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
Judge.

kkb.8/4.