H.B.Paramesh vs State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009

” hiviififix: Yes} £60

responcients in the auctiaon conducted in acwrdaijgcffifiiiég
the eztier pagseci by this Cfltift S3131} be ‘
}”€’:5.§pOfi(§€fl'{S and smcceasfui biciziaris_¢;1tii:€§£i i{;..’;;¥{V’b’§$s€i_V
on the canflrmatien of ms imvirgzgiiffezi:

wetifiancrs. are aggrisvad on ‘fhfi .Vgr0uz71i¥. cf fvi’o $a%;i;o’1:-V. .=:::f’a;{1y * V

statufmy pracedazre, ‘she;3%”‘a?€::»:3€viib;£3rt’§,?.i¢3 .;<§ héflemg$ the order
af coizfgrmatiairg i_1iL'V.ap§arQpié.ifie __ .;31fosc r3<=} ci £%igs, ix} accmd.an<:€:
with law. V »

AV;:<:c3_r€1i:?;§;{j5,a,V_Vi;he*x§éii'£__ petition is disposed sf, with

me abovésgajid Sd/__
Chief Euséticfi

Sd/-3;

Iudg3