High Court Karnataka High Court

Nanjaiah Alias Nanjappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Nanjaiah Alias Nanjappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2008
Author: N.K.Patil


….. .?_A…Vgu.u vr- :\MluVH-\U~\I\A HIUH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURY OF KARNI-WAKA HEGH

2% $33 §1§§ mama? Q? KfiEfi&?%K& gr gggsaaoaz.
fi?E§; TRIS vag 2%” SA? 9? Jawa fifias.

‘: EEFQRE :

EEK EQH*3LE ER.J¥STE$E N,§,EfiTI§L= f»

%Rzz yzzzrzag §s,2a@§§ $3 2$a3§L§.”= *§,=~

BE’?§’EE§é:

$§I.Efi%JA}AH ALIAE wgganyan, _m_._ u
fiffl §E%§fi§§AEAB’%éEA§ §§§§§§§R,’Vu

Rfififi F§.BE§?.?’E’ €32′ ‘£’ERF:S,

REA? afiififififififi ¥K&&%G, _
fififififififififikfikflai Pfi$T, »». =
TH¥MRQ§fl§fiLQ H6851; ¢ ;’ ‘ ; _4-v._ :
%Efl££%fi§&§E ?aafi£,is=V.’; i ‘ 1′.”””w’

anxaxzaxa §:s§x:a%:a-g ‘,,

“,1. ?ETUflG§ER

2:3?” ,;%S’:&:: ; #2:; géskiégfiggz-:$:»$RAzA:-§, }>«.B’a”GC}7\’i”E . ;

&§§:

$33 §?A?E%$§ xaggafazx”

a? :?£”sa£Rx?A&¥?

“=,§E¥$§§§,§§$AR?HE§?;”

%Va,§aza3:§§,

‘V,2£§$aLa3Etf»

%%E aA§§’§g:2§§AL
E? Z?3 ?fiE3§EEMT,”

figagxmaaaaa wxaux,

“-w_”@EAM3wgaaA.

“=éa;.g&&As$§§¥mA

EEEKE EJER5? 5?’ H13 LEE’.

‘um;

3%: . i-‘?F*..i”€§e?s.@.?’s Cf’§€’2Ifi..T”2’.a3’t;E2′:E”{£
SSE . %..}%§§33~iI-{E }{»§:§ ‘5
3&3 . E}. Kfifififiififif

fsé. }€.§%;?é’§s.?€T}{.§Ifi.§-ii

SEE . C}’§§§?i’-D§.E(3%f}’§§§3-‘*.i

’69 ilk 9.”; 3;? gm
V.-m V-mi’ uh-M’ ‘¥ou9.

.. . .. ……n..–…..–. » man uvufil ur RAKNAIAKA HiGI'”l COURT OF KARNA’¥’AKA 3-HGH COSRT OF KARNA’§’&KA REG?

1: 9
Pk}

,3’*.;’.§;E..: –,-*¥:§iE $91:-Iiifi?-13 ,

SEQ Eflxififififih KUPEE,
?w%§u§ waavx a az5?§:¢?. .”,-._g
.,. RE§?3fl§EfiTS ¥*

3% ffiE.§E§E$%.3§1VEA§§fiE?E¢ 339? yen 3.1 ; z;~V
3 .

. .?2¥EflRCRELA? Afi?DCA?E §0R R.3(awC;»f ”
RE$F$§BE§?§ 3{a§ 5 {é§~fiRE §ERVH§;} *

iriiiwi

?hi$ §rit ?atitia§ :3 zzgaa un§a;v3¢ti&;é3~’

aad 3?? af aha fimn2titutiafi*g§.:nfiiaaprayi§g

guazh thé arfigr gasséfi by thé~§afi§ Tribfifial,

.Lamangai&, dateé E8H3,3$fi3 ifi5;th$’.§r§tae§ing$

fi$.L§?{L%SE§f?3~?§g. in 3$”uf$xV=a$_’§£§$&iing the
Farm §a,? far ;§r3fifi éf i¢%c§ga§&ywmrights in

rasgaat sf :a§s§gi§g[_3wgg¢$g§_V$.jguntas vifia

fingfixm fimgmu%%$ma€a3~

Afinéxmra~fi gnfi gig} 7

fi2§Q 0% FGR aznnxms
F§Laa¥EfiG:

THEE $33?’ %§@:%z§§.”

~Th3 V§&fiitimnez claiming t¢ ha tenant

héixg’a§g£;§%sa by thé fizégr datad :3.a3.2903

VV._ ;n. glafiaefiinga E¢.LRFfL§fSf?§~?é gagged by
~£%a Lamfi Tribumal, Néiamangaia, by rejeating
*, “his miaim f$r gzant aé acmupancy Eights t9 the

2axten% sought in Eamm $3.? in $yuRc.6§

aituatefi at Eflkkaaandza ?ii2age; mgaauring é

…_ .. …..-.9 . ..v. g \u\I\Jl\F ur av-\mw»uAI\A HIGH LJOURT OF KARNATAEA H¥GH COURT OF KARNATAKA HiGI§

F!
{£33
I!

3. I have heabfi the Eaarmafi fiaunsel fa:
%%e ;etit1@n$r and Eaazaed fiwvsznmant ?EeafiéfiF F

far zgfigfinéanza 3. and 2 aka ieaxnga ¢§fin$$1C=”

fa: t§a z$a§¢nfient fisaufi {a :9 5%},

§. .%fter* aazefal $va3uati@m Qf5A the i

z3¢$x@$ made availahla hfE fiha Ga?é§hmént
Fieaéar apyearing fez :&ayfihde§t§ i,anfi 2 and

the flrflea paaaefi §y th§”3afi¢$d”r§3§¢hdant «

Lawfi ?:ik2nal¢’ fih&t:li§’5efi$:§$sm§that the

gatitiengr {hag , fil§§f E$:fi”‘ 33.? fax

ragiatrazfian fiffgcmfigagag righta ta an extent

Qf :wa;Wacx$a’jj{f§yQ§$:%§ txa 23.12.l9?%. The

remmmflvafurightg fivéilabia ix tha file shows

hia*fia$E ig the ¢fiitivat¢:”s ficlumn. But, the

“:t:’;:.::~;2;n»§j;a»..;2~:5;’e;-;T.éassm the impugmcsi Order withmt

Etrigfi fifiglianme sf Ruie 1? mi Kazmataka Land

TR~¢ Eafc:m&$ §nia3, i§?fi zaafi wgith. Eeaticgx 34 at
‘A iY:;x’;:a-:»3.,_ fiiazrzataka Lanai Revanzm fiat; and witltmut
u”= §$éigning _any ¥alid zeasans, gxantimg

fficmggancy zights in zesgect sf 1 acra af land

malyy Tharefsra, the imgagned. Grder is net

austainahle in law and thg sang is iiabla to

u–.

«A _-A…-in-……. V. nuanivnlflnfl nu.-:r1 LUUKI ur I(AI(NA’I’AKA HiGH COURT OF KARNAYAKA HIGH COURT OF KRRNATAKA HEQH

fkg agaanfi zeggamdant W Lang Tribunai is

ééxsmtefi. ta xefleiva 333 sa and prQ$éEfiHA

fuzthmz in ammgliamaa efi the §ireatiam$7i$$2§& “~’

by this Saar: as statafi augisyw-

firfiaréd acafiraiagiy.

%” f Iudq6

sd!~