High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Rajbala vs State Of Haryana on 8 May, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Rajbala vs State Of Haryana on 8 May, 2009
Criminal Misc. No. M- 11758 of 2009                                    1




          In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh.



                   Criminal Misc. No. M- 11758 of 2009

                       Date of Decision: 8.5.2009


Rajbala
                                                              ...Petitioner
                                  Versus
State of Haryana
                                                            ...Respondent


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.


Present: Mr. Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate
         for the petitioners.


Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral)

The present petition has been preferred under Section 438

Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 118

dated 20.4.2009 registered at Police Station Uchan, District Jind,

under Sections 363, 366 & 120-B IPC.

On 30.4.2009, this Court had passed the following order:-

“Counsel has submitted that daughter of

the complainant Tabushub @ Seena has eloped

with Kuldeep, son of the petitioner. It is stated that

the day she left her house, she was major. Counsel

has further submitted that there was a long-standing

love relationship between the son of the petitioner

and daughter of the complainant.

Criminal Misc. No. M- 11758 of 2009 2

Issue notice of motion for 8th May, 2009.

In the event of arrest, petitioner shall be

released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the

arresting officer. However, petitioner shall join

investigation as and when called for. Petitioner shall

abide by the conditions specified under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C.”.

Counsel for the State, on instructions from Hari Bhallabh,

Assistant Sub Inspector, stated that petitioner has joined investigation

and his custodial interrogation is not required.

In view of the statement made by counsel for the State and

order dated 30.4.2009 passed by this Court, interim pre-arrest bail

granted to the petitioner is affirmed till filing of the report under Section

173 Cr.P.C. On submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C.

petitioner shall furnish regular bail-bonds to the satisfaction of the Court

concerned.

With the observations made above, the present petition is

disposed off.

(Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia)
Judge
May 8, 2009
“DK”