High Court Kerala High Court

P.Natarajan vs State Of Kerala on 23 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
P.Natarajan vs State Of Kerala on 23 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA.No. 2375 of 2009()


1. P.NATARAJAN,S/O.J.PADMANABHAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,

3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

4. KERALA AGRL.INCOME TAX & SALES TAX

                For Petitioner  :SRI.O.RAMACHANDRAN NAMBIAR

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice MR.P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :23/02/2010

 O R D E R
                           P.R. RAMAN Ag. CJ &
                    C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                          W.A. NO. 2375 OF 2009
                        = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        DATED THIS, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010.

                              J U D G M E N T

Ramachandran Nair, J.

Appeal against assessment completed under Section 17D is

maintainable before the Tribunal only on payment of assessed tax.

Appellant filed writ petition, for a direction, before this Court, to the

Tribunal, to dispense with payment, entertain the appeal and dispose of the

same on merits. However, learned Single Judge, going by the statutory

provision, declined to grant relief; but left open the right of the appellant to

remit the assessed tax and argue the appeal on merits. It is against this

judgment, the appeal is filed.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and Special

Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. During admission

hearing, this Court had granted an interim order against recovery, on

payment of Rs. 1 lakh, which, appellant has not so far remitted. Even

though Tribunal is not entrusted with any power to dispense with

payment of tax for entertaining the appeal, this Court, under Article 226, has

the authority to pass appropriate orders. Since the appellant’s claims is one

of exemption and not on turn over dispute or rate of tax and having regard

WA 2375/2009 2

to the special features of the case, we allow the writ appeal by modifying the

judgment of the learned Single Judge by directing the appellant to pay

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) in terms of the interim order, within a

period of two weeks from receipt of this judgment, failing which, appeal

pending before the Tribunal will stand dismissed as defective and

respondents will be entitled to proceed for recovery of the entire arrears.

However, if payment is made as directed above, the Tribunal will

entertain the appeal, hear the matter on merits and dispose of the same.

The writ appeal is disposed of as above.

P.R. RAMAN,
(Ag. CHIEF JUSTICE)

C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
(JUDGE).

knc/-