High Court Kerala High Court

Asokan Vasu vs District Superintendent Of … on 23 January, 2009

Kerala High Court
Asokan Vasu vs District Superintendent Of … on 23 January, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 1278 of 2009(B)


1. ASOKAN VASU, AGED 56 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

3. RAJEEV, C.P.I. PANCHAYATH MEMBER,

4. VENJARAMOODU SASI,

5. ELAKAMON SATHEESAN,

6. S.HARIHARAN PILLAI, VILAYIL VEEDU,

7. G.JANARDHANAN NAIR, "SHRADHA",

8. SREEKUMAR @ THAMPI,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF

                For Respondent  :SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR

The Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice MR.J.B.KOSHY
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :23/01/2009

 O R D E R
              J.B. KOSHY, Ag.C.J. &
                        V.GIRI, J.
        -------------------------
             W.P.(c).NO.1278 of 2009
        -------------------------
          Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009.


                       JUDGMENT

Koshy, Ag.C.J.

It is submitted by counsel for

respondents 6 to 8 as well as respondents 3

and 4 that they are not causing any problems.

The allegations are denied. It is also

submitted that a portion of the puramboke land

was encroached upon by the petitioner and

Ext.R6(a) mahazar has been produced by

respondents 6 to 8 along with the counter

affidavit.

2. It is submitted by the learned

counsel for the petitioner that another writ

petition has been filed regarding that

portion. In the circumstances, before getting

the question of encroachment decided, the

petitioner will not make any further

construction in the disputed portion. The

W.P.(c).NO.1278/09

:: 2 ::

petitioner has to approach the appropriate

court or local authority to resolve the

dispute of encroachment. Protection should

be given to the petitioner and his wife and

children as well as the workers and

sufficient and effective protection should

be given to the petitioner to run the hotel.

Writ petition is disposed of as

above.

Sd/-

(J.B. KOSHY)
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

(V.GIRI)
JUDGE

sk/
//true copy//

P.S. to Judge