High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Abu Talib @ Md. Talib vs The State Of Bihar on 21 November, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Abu Talib @ Md. Talib vs The State Of Bihar on 21 November, 2011
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.37717 of 2011
                 Abu Talib @ Md. Talib, son of late Sk. Taiyab, resident of village-Baturbari,
                 P.S.-Tarabari, District-Araria.                      ...........Petitioner
                                           Versus
                 The State of Bihar                                   ..........Opp. Party.
                                          -----------

2 21.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

It is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. It is submitted

on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is a labourer. He had

gone to Punjab in order to earn his livelihood. He is in custody

since 16.6.2011. He undertakes not to misuse the privilege of bail

in future.

It is also submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal

antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the

petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds

of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Ist Additional

Sessions Judge, Araria in connection with S.T. No. 809 of 2011

arising out of Araria P.S. Case No. 88 of 1995 subject to the

following conditions that (i) That bailors should be the son and

close relative of the petitioner. The bailors will also undertake to

inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the

petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall

not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on
2

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is

implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in

the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to

initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of

misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he

will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on

the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well

represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive

dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Sanjeet/                                   (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)