High Court Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Sandeep Bhandawat vs Rajkumar Pitti on 24 November, 2008

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Sandeep Bhandawat vs Rajkumar Pitti on 24 November, 2008
                                                       SBCCP No.31/2008
                                     Sandeep Bhandawat Vs. Raj Kumar Pitti


                               1

                 SBCCP No.31/2008
        Sandeep Bhandawat Vs. Raj Kumar Pitti

DATE OF ORDER : - 24.11.2008


         HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J.

Mr. Sandeep Bhandawat petitioner with his counsel Mr.
MC Bhoot is present.

Mr.RK Pitti, respondent contemnor with his counsel
Mr. RK Thanvi as well as Mr. PK Bhansali is present.

The petitioner as well as Shri RK Pitti on behalf of the

respondent-club are present in person.

Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the

award was passed in favour of the petitioner, which was set

aside by the learned District Judge, against which, appeal

has been preferred and in the appeal, the operation of the

order passed by the learned District Judge has been stayed

and, therefore, the petitioner has submitted this contempt

petition on the ground that he has not been reinstated in

the club as member.

Learned counsel for the parties submitted that to

avoid all difficulties, the club has agreed that petitioner will
SBCCP No.31/2008
Sandeep Bhandawat Vs. Raj Kumar Pitti

2

be reinstated in membership of the club from the date from

which the membership was terminated on payment of all

the dues for which the respondent-club will raise the bill

within a period of one week from today. The petitioner

agrees that he will make payment of all the bills raised by

the respondent- club. The respondent also undertakes that

on payment of bills by the petitioner, the member-ship of

the petitioner shall stand revive subject to decision given in

the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order

passed by the learned District Judge, Jodhpur. The

payment, which is to be made by the petitioner in view of

this agreed order will also be subject to the decision of the

appeal no.785/2008.

Hence, the present contempt petition is disposed of in

view of the above agreement between the parties.

(PRAKASH TATIA), J.

c.p.goyal/-