High Court Kerala High Court

Ajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 13 August, 2007

Kerala High Court
Ajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 13 August, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4824 of 2007()


1. AJESH, S/O. ASOKAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :13/08/2007

 O R D E R
                         R.BASANT, J.
                      ----------------------
                      B.A.No.4824 of 2007
                  ----------------------------------------
             Dated this the 13th day of August 2007


                             O R D E R

Application for regular bail. The petitioner is the second

accused. Altogether there are two accused persons. The alleged

incident took place on 06/07/2007. The crux of the allegations

raised by the prosecution is that the accused persons A1 and A2

had picked up a quarrel with the deceased earlier on that day.

On account of that animosity, both of them allegedly went to the

house of the victim, armed with dangerous weapons. The

deceased was residing alone in the house on the relevant date.

He was allegedly subjected to a brutal attack with dangerous

sticks by accused 1 and 2. The deceased allegedly succumbed to

the injury on the same night. The petitioner was arrested on

9/7/2007. He continues in custody from 09/07/2007. The

learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is

absolutely innocent. He is a boy aged about 18 years. He had

completed the age of 18 years shortly prior to the date of

occurrence. He does not have any specific motive against the

B.A.No.4824/07 2

deceased. There is no eye witness to the occurrence. At any

rate, the petitioner aged about 18 years who has been in custody

from 9/7/2007 may now be enlarged on bail, submits the learned

counsel for the petitioner.

2. Application is opposed by the learned Public

Prosecutor. I find merit in the opposition by the learned Public

Prosecutor. Investigation is not complete. I have gone through

the case diary. The available indications do point to the

complicity of the petitioner. I agree with the learned Public

Prosecutor that it is too early to consider the release of the

petitioner on bail.

3. In the result, this petition is dismissed. However, I

may hasten to observe that the petitioner shall be at liberty to

move this court or the Sessions court for bail again at later

stages of the investigation not, at any rate, prior to 24/08/2007.

The investigating officer shall, in the meantime, make every

endeavour to complete the investigation.





                                             (R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

            // True Copy//      PA to Judge

B.A.No.4824/07    3

B.A.No.4824/07    4

       R.BASANT, J.




         CRL.M.CNo.




            ORDER




21ST DAY OF MAY2007