High Court Kerala High Court

K.V.Jose vs The Chief Executive Engineer on 17 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
K.V.Jose vs The Chief Executive Engineer on 17 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 5075 of 2010(H)


1. K.V.JOSE, KUDIYIRIPPIL HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,

3. CHRISTY MODERN RICE MILL,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOSE J.MATHAIKAL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :17/02/2010

 O R D E R
                T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
             ---------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No.5075 OF 2010
              ---------------------------------------
         Dated this the 17th day of February, 2010.


                        J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is the President of Mattoor Pallithazham

Padasekhara Samithi. According to the petitioner, the cultivation

in the above padasekharam is mainly by depending on the water

supply from the Spout No.5 of the Chengamanadu branch canal

of the Chalakudy Left kara canal. The 3rd respondent is a Modern

Rice Mill which is engaged in the manufacture of rice after

processing the paddy.

2. According to the petitioner, the functioning of the above

Mill causes acute pollution and because of the waste generated

by them, the irrigation canal is obstructed. It is also stated that

by Exhibit P1 interim order passed by the District Court in

C.M.A.No.3/2009, the 3rd respondent is prohibited from

discharging waste materials from their premises to the water

channel. It is now complained that Spout No.5 is remaining

closed preventing the irrigation water reaching the

W.P.(C) No.5075/2010 2

padasekharam.

3. The petitioner has moved the 1st respondent in the

matter by filing Exhibit P2 representation. It is prayed that a

direction may be issued to the 1st respondent to take a decision

on Exhibit P2.

There will be a direction to the 1st respondent to take a

decision on Exhibit P2, after hearing the petitioner and the

3rd respondent within a period of one month.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
JUDGE

smp