High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Present:- Mr. P.S.Jammu vs Unknown on 18 February, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Present:- Mr. P.S.Jammu vs Unknown on 18 February, 2009
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH
                           -.-

                                            Crl. Misc. No. M-54032 of 2007
                                            Date of Decision:- 18.2.2009



Arvinder Singh                 Versus               State of Punjab & Ors.



Present:- Mr. P.S.Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioner.

            Mr. R.S.Rawat, AAG, Punjab.

M.M.S.BEDI. (J) (Oral)

            This petition has been filed for quashing for FIR No. 156, dated

5.7.2007

, under Section 18-A, 18-B of Drug and Cosmetics Act, 1940 read

with Section 420 IPC, registered at Police Station City Kotkapura, District

Faridkot.

Petitioner is running a shop of chemist with the name and style of

M/s A.S.Medical Store situated at Pheruman Chowk, Kotkapura, District

Faridkot. He holds a valid license issued by State Drugs Controller, Punjab,

Sector 34-A, Chandigarh, Annexure P-2 for sale of medicines and drugs on

the wholesale basis valid from 1.1.2007 to 31.12.2011. The FIR was

registered against the petitioner on the ground that though he is a wholesaler

licnesee but stip cutting recovered from his shop indicated that he was

selling the medicines at retail basis. The FIR was registered at the instance

of District Drug Inspector, District Faridabad, on the basis of letter dated

5.7.2007 sent to S.S.P Faridkot. The FIR registered on the basis of

following complaint, Annexure P-1:-

“Subject:- Joint drug raid dated 5.7.2007-M/s A.S.Medical Store,

Pheruman Chowk, Kotkapura,, sir, it is requested that today

on 5.7.2007 a joint drug raid along with your department was
Crl. Misc. No. M-54032 of 2007 -2-

conducted at the shop of M/s A.S.Medical Store, Pheruman

Chowk, Kotkapura. Medicines mentioned below were recovered

and seized without having bill on from no.16, Sr. No.1 9×100 tab.

Microlit, Sr.No. 2-3×10+10 Cap. Promul Spasm. Above said

medicines was being misused as drug, Sr. No. 25X1 strip.

Accupreg test kit above said medicines is necessary to kept at 3C

temperature to 30C but this medicines was lying in the room

temperature at about 40C, the medicines which are at Sr. No.4, Sr.

No.5, Sr. No.6 were having strip cutting, whereas this firm has

wholesale license and strip cutting shows that they are selling at

retail basis.

Main contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no

FIR can be registered on account of violation of provisions of Drug and

Cosmatic Act read with Section 420 IPC. It is only a complaint filed by

Drug Inspector which is maintainable before the Judicial Magistrate, in case

of violation of the provisions of the Drug and Cosmatic Act. The ambit of

taking cognizance is mentioned in Section 32 of the Drugs and Cosmatics

Act laying down that no prosecution shall be instituted under the Drugs and

Cosmatics Act, except by a Inspector or by the person aggrieved or by a

recognised consumer association, whether such person is a member of that

association or not. In the present case, offence under Section 420 IPC has

been added in order to give colour of ‘cognizable offence’ to enable the

police to register the FIR.

Careful perusal of the complaint sent by Drug Inspector, which

is reproduced hereinabove indicates that no offence under Section 420
Crl. Misc. No. M-54032 of 2007 -3-

IPC is made out. The necessary ingradients to attract punishment under

Section 420 IPC are that there has to be fradulant and intentional

inducement of a person by deciving him. The person so decived should be

induced to deliver any property to any person or to consent that any person

shall retain any property or that the person so decieved should be

intentionally induced to do or omit to do anything which he would not

continue or omit if he were not so deceived.

In the present case, there is absolutely no allegation that any one

was induced to part with any property. The simple allegation against the

petitioner is that he being a wholesale dealer was suspected of selling the

medicins in retail. As the offence under Section 420 IPC is not made out

the lodging of FIR under the Drugs and Cosmatics Act is nothing but an

abuse of process of the Court.

This petitionis allowed. FIR No. 156, dated 5.7.2007 is hereby

quashed. However, Drug Inspector will be at liberty to initiate proceedings

in accordance with law by following the correct procedure provided under

the Drugs and Cosmatics Act.

February 18, 2009                                           (M.M.S.Bedi)
tripti                                                        Judge