IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
DATED Tms THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2§§o9
PRESENT " k'
THE HON'BLE MR.JUsT1cE A 'A
AND
THE HON'BLE 1\/£R.gJUSTEIC:I:'}ji.BiIE.Ig;?§\LPIi?.fi\; "
MFA.N0.1EV30'$:./"$2006 {EC}-.._ "
BETWEEN: * %
1. smt.c.N.Vanama1a*@eIxqalifn; '
Aged about 33 yea»1fsV,V '
Wife of K.SriDivas::, V ' D _ ._ .
C/o.NarayaI;1aCT;af--.e
2. Sri.K,VV'isWasV V'a;L'da1';..e_
Minor",¢Aged about' Slyears.
Soryof K.S1fi:1iiras*a.,
'I3?,ep_r'esentet:i" by___l_1is mother
. V '}'\nd%:'Nat: ;ra1 Guardian,
--Fir='st'appAe'}}ant herein,
'«.T'_C}1'\T.Vax_na'fm--a1a @ Malini.
""'B0t._fi'a3*:'e' residing at No.80.
41" Cross, 5"' Main,
= A. , euvijétyanagar,
V' , _ Bangalore -- 40. ..APPELLAN'I' S
' !£By Sri.G.V.Thiruma1a,AdV.,)
6%}.
AND:
K.Srinivasan,
Aged about 46 years,
Son of Srinivasa Gopalachar, _
Residing at Kathwadipura Agrah-data, A
K.R.I\/Iohaiia, s
Mysore--24. 0' ..RESP--QFlD'$NT''~.
[Respondent is held dri1y*...vV"Se'i§§ed'
unrepresented vide court order.,Vdated 1’5…00_9′.2009)
This M.F;A, is fiied :ur1derr,_Seit:_tioi:i;” 19 (1) of FC Act
against the;~’J”e1d.gmentg Or’der__VVVfdated 03.12.2005
passed m__ ose%Ni:_,2o3./f2oQ%2 onfthe file of the 11 Addl. Prl.
Judge, Court[C£3.angaioije;” partiy decreeirig the
suit fori.In_ainten:;_3noc.,_” 0′
V,This » IVIFA” Coming” for orders this day,
KSREEDHAR RAQ;.J;;.,de3,iVered the following-
%’ .’§§DGMENT
uTheV firxstvaypellant is the wife of the respondent
‘ appellant is the minor child of the
appeiiants have filed petition seeking
maiiiterjance. The Family Court has granted
A 00_rhai_ntenance of Rs.2,000/- p.m. to the first appellant
and RS.500/- pm. for the maintenance of the second
appellant. The Family Court had also directed..to.crea,te
a charge on the suit schedule property. At”
petition, the respondent was working hell’
was getting salary of Rs.l5,0(l0/
evidence that the respondenfhas the”.
employment. Thg .–~;esponden_t:’ oyvrig house
property in Mysore. it the financial
conditions, Vfrriyailntenance at the
rate of lthenfirst appellant and
appears to be on
a lower’
_ .2: lulnivithat yieyi}; we direct that the respondent
. haaintenahce at the rate of Rs.2,500/– pm. to
the and Rs.1,000/- pm. to the second
ap’peIlan’t-laiintil he attains majority. The enhanced
maintenance shall be payable from the date of appeal.
order of the Family Court creating charge on the
JV
suit property 13 Confirmed. It is further directed that the
order of creating charge on the suit prope:_Tye:’j’te”-,Vbe
communicated to the concerned Sub–RegiStraif,~:.e:”te
noted in the concerned rec0rcisV-for the purpuciee of vpjubivic ‘
notice.
[ sd;@
“Ridge
sd/-
A JUDGE
Bss.