Karnataka High Court
Mr Sreekanth vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 August, 2009
-1-
IN $33 I-IIGI-I comm' or' KARNATAKA, *
DATED THIS THE 12th DAY.:€fIF..A{}'c}i}'$'i5;.~'I:g£j0§'.T;
BEP'0RE;§fl ' T
THEE §~I(3N'BLE MR.J'USTif:E._RAM
WRIT PE'fi'I'1'£()N Ne.gQ61 1'..8a'2.(}81'3.-_ :5 (#20929 (T-ET)
BETWEEN
MR s§eE§:1<AI~sfTH'li:.L»= V f
A{}E{) PoRi:'Y"Ir1x;«=,€<:,-i2_f1a:A§§--s ' ' *
s/0 LATE 11 (::fi_S';i51AN'${RAPP.a "
occ: BU.sIl;'fi:S$
M/S '1iHEATTR*E,.Guz?u9-HREE_ --
M C RoA19,'MAN13Y.A '
PETITIQNER
(By ,-'511.'i ; P 'N .r:::s:G;§E;"Atj'i} )
A. .....
._ 'I':~:TE_~v..S'1ii§*'i"'ié: OF KARNATAKA
_ ' RI::Pi3frATI'rs SECRETARY
DEPARTMENI' OF ENFORMATAION AND
~~3R9ADcA3r1NG, VIDHANA SQUBHA,
.. BANGALQRE
" 'mg CC)MM£SSiONEiR OF CZGMMERCIAL TAXES
K G ROAD, GANDHINAGAR
BANGALOI-?E~56G009
3 THE COMMISSIONER C}F' §i"€F'ORMA'I"'§0N
FILM §)IV£SiON
IST FLOOR, BADAMI BUILDING
N R CHOWK, .!?3ANGALOI?E»56{}OO2
1 SK
' .
-3-
as to whether it was an original Ka1mad_a""fi1«:t;--___e; _
remake. The Committee is said to have' '* 'V
decision to the effect that the fiimz 3 11,231
remake of 'Unnanai NiI1a1't.hu__', th'ereV¥:5yV 1:he~,'
film 'Krishna' to _f1'oz.:1'1' ~ . j_:§;.)_eLy"§V};.ient of
emenzainmem tax. 5.10.2007 :0
}.8.12.i2(}()7 \;'hVez1 exhibited,
undoubtecfgiy payment of
:£:'r:AI:1lj5:ViI1 the year 2009 that
the that the flim was not
entitled ti) tfiiexempiion.
= I1': ..a}mos{iiientiea1 circumstances when other
.g3jva§;,:_1-i'V?V)iE'V{V):v'IfS.v e'4p:Jeiemd Writ Petiition Nos/$113/()9 and
7:ee3/o_e,e :1~ais com; by orders dated 24.5.2009 and
e"33;?-i3fi9§, respectively; ailowed the petitions party,
e q§1ae}:§ed the demand notices for payment of
-»ezi{er£e:inmemt tax for the period from 5.1{).}.€;)97' to
20.12.2007
whiie directing the petitioners to pay {he
2
mi…
mtertainment tax for the period oflm’ than _
pmod. For the V613.-* same reasons, t11e_– V
orders Annexumd series and 1316 Z-dafinéand-.. fiotiéfies :;
Am:exum–K series are quashed.’_V
The writ; goetmons
In