M/S Umrah Developers vs V. Madhu on 27 August, 2010

IN THE'. HIGH COURT Q13' KARNATAKA AT BAN

DATED 'mzs THE 2?TH my OF' AUGUST 20"

PRESENT'

THE) HONBLE MR.J.S..KHEHAR,_§CHII§Fv'Ji§?;T'Qi'I'C34;'EfAV  

AND A
THE HOEWBLE MRs.JuST:§%E  %
ace NQ. }(}3'V1--,1-:Vi€;;_O'i€T¢_I\/Zlhiji'  
BETWEEN: "  % 'V A' 

M/S UMRAH I}E)'%¥'_EL€:>FE}€S,   
No.22 / 1, MILLEIR TANK EBUN13 Roar);
KAVERIYAPPA.VLA'{QUT1§__BAN'G23LQRE--52
REPRESENTEEBY'"i'i'S'?E€(3PRIE;'I'OR
SR1 D. BABI}f.@ YiUfiUi€'¢_SBAR"V1F'F

       ~  COMPLAINANT

(BY Sm R${E}3Ef£'3'_  ADV. ,)

Arm : 

A j1 .«.  vi §gLa:)HU

,J>sECRE$ARY,
'   DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
 M,-S. B?UH,D1NG, BANGALORE.

 2.  AYYAPPA,

A  DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

V'  RANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

KG. ROAD, BANGALORE.
 ACCUSED

(§Y $RE V. S. HEGDE, AGA FOR R1 & 2)



2

THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND
12 OF' THE CONTEMPT SF COURTS ACT PRAYINCI TO
iNI'I'IA'fE'E CONTEMPI' PROCEEDINGS AGAINSTVT'."THE
RESPONQENT AND PUPKSH HE/E FOR HEAVKING

WILLFULLY AND BELIBERATELY D§SC}BE.¥E3}I).."__"T.EiE
ORDERS/DiRE(ZT1ONS ISSUED BY THIS 
14/06/2010 PASSEQ "~--.IN--f "Wi3i'l""  

om":-ER DATED M M
PETITION NO.1797'Q/2010 (KLR).,Vi§)_E AZ\TNE§3{¥£R'E+g€y 

THIS 00:: COMING ON FGR  AV%;~A§*;i#

CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE?' FOLL{)W'ING:  .
Oasagv ""

J.s.1<:HEHAR. cu. (o;egn¢_ 

Through    petition, the
compiainaiii  ciisobedience of the
order passedby  C0!j'1"t= ofi1"1'4§5.2o 10 in Writ Petition
N0. 179?2 :20 19;    

Aéditional

._f " ? V' .I:¥€:gde, learned

 'C'::3izsexjr1rIje1*_1i:» Aévocate, Who has erztersd appearance on

   the accused -respondents, has filed a

.__n:1em0~. Cofiy of the memo has been handed over to the

“if counsel for the Colnpiainant wpetitioxzer.

3. A perusal of the memo revmls that the order

14.6.2010, 0:11 the basis whereof, the instant