IN THE I.--IiGH' COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH_.AT
DHARWARD
Dated 21" day of August 2009
BEFORE
HoN'BLE MR. J'USTV1C_E N.4KIjMAR A ' A
AND
HON'BLE MR. JUSTI(f--1".{.B1.AS}{EeEI§Ii~VA'SE_»GOWDA
Between:
Smt.Sharada @ Sharawwa, » ' A
W/o Vittal Hare-Ali, _
Aged about year$;"d.A'V_.. _ _ --
R/at Gadyai, Tq. §i'ami:hénid§., A _ '
Dist. Bagaikote.' ' _
(by Sri MtL;f;ty'unjay .Tata_V_VBdngid; Advocate)
ari'd_ X'
». Shri Vi§--a§2a;'nahafi_tes};,; ' A
.__ A""S'r'o K.uma--reppa~ Majnagoli_,
" A ._Aged about 45V"'3{ears,
A " "RI'at Kumbar 0.113, Bilagi,
5 _"Di_s'tfBaga'i--akote.
:SrivBasava. Prabhu Hosakeri, Advocate)
R? No. 4ew2007 :EN"}\./.1;:F.A._I;Jo;'.4229/v:ZO06
Petitioner
- Respondent
This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with
Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying to reviews/_”the
order passed by this Court in M.F.A. No. 4229/2006. °
This appeal coming for preliminary hearing this it
Sri N. Kumar, J, delivered the following judghrnenpt.
JUDGMENT I A
l. Heard learned counsel for the peititioner. it l
days in preferring this Review lv’fé=t..ition.Vy.-}vii:is’eellaneotisi’ appeafcame to
be dismissed as there was no merit. ;_To’i*e§&’iew_tn.e” dismissal order this
Revision Petition is filed’..,_
2. We do not.see.Zaiiy;;§_nsti.ficatiiioi.«l.toWcondone the delay of 522
days. Even otherwise, welido ‘-not .seeéiny”mei’it.i’ii the Review Petition.
Accordingly Review Petitioniiilasvvell as application for condonation of
delay are dismissed. ” _____
ludg3
3d/-2
Iudg3
“*3