Karnataka High Court
M/S Royal Sundaram Alliance … vs Radhamma W/O Late Bheemanna @ … on 10 November, 2009
....-"nun ruun uuulu ur KAKNATAKA HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNA'¥'AKA i-HGH COUR'
H! ':m man cctmr mt mmram AT naxmwm
mmn 'rm TM 1073 my er xovmamxtfgzgeos
TI-IE HOEBLE mmmmm % AL ' «._
BETWEEN
Cflflflfifljfiflfi
1 ms ROYAL mmmamagnmxag e
IH&JRAHCE,CQL'!E'W '
MAHGALYA X
30.132, antenna RDAD, %
mneamm s.a.'ze:s2s % AV %
BY A¥J'fiiEi3'RI£3EI) sicmammj'
(BY ma, mv.)
nuns-an
13:0 mm Bmamnm
% E§£EE!i£A¥A!~I
__fl{§EZ}..£LBm!T 31 YEARS
- mo mm 31'-msmma.
@ at-mzmmn
Z awn mm 14 $3538
» ' 3, Rama: we mm mmmmma @ BI-EEMAIAH
£1335 AEQW 12 YEARS
4» mwszczrmxcrmawm
£1631} ABGJT 66 YEARS
5 JAYA.M& W! O 111%
.....n..-nun -nun uuuxl ur KAKNATAKA HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR
AGED ABQJT 61 YEARS
RESPOHDEHT3 2 AND 3 ARE MBIORS
REP BY Mfilfik RE~SPC}HDEIi'T«-1
ALL ARE BIA 110.23, rm "B" CROSS, 551%: _
PHASE, J.P.HAGAR, BANGALORE-7$""" « %
MAJQRHIAGE
£.'3FPzA.F'.EvI.C..YARD % % k
M.G.ROAD, C mfim, " - _
KCDLAR msTRz<:*r * '
(BY SI-{RI BHUSHAKI 32:13 R1-is,
sxm FOR R6)
THIS MFA ix/$%1%s(%1; or W ACT
AGAINST AWARD mmn:
2.3.2006
Hassfin mi m:3L cm Tm mg
or Anm..s1uaLL caums wmz, nmmzx,
(SC£1H;HO..}i5),21WAmfiIG”” A commxsanon 0?
1=:s.-t~,9o%,c:okt3ieAkkxwri–zT1za*1’2*.zms’r @ 5% RA mom ‘rim
BATE. are PE.’ITI’IC}jHv’I_fII-.L…I)EF|£}SFI’.
commits an FDR rmmme THIS DAY,
nsuvzsmm Ti-E magma:
Hm mm Caumel for the perm in
the appeal pmfiz-ed by the Imursm
Q. ‘% su’bm’nu;inn of the harfi Cmmel
Sh:-i K.Suryanm’% Ran fin: tlaeamnantia that the
ankmw wtmfiim@ was thatwifile
«<37