High Court Karnataka High Court

Parvathevva Dodli vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Parvathevva Dodli vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
BETWEEN :

1.

IN THE HIGH comm' ore' KARNATAKA,...'4"  " 

CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAQV"""-L V  %

DATED THIS THE mm J 

HON' BLE MR. JUS1'iCjE..A.IFI;'J._GUNJ:Ai;*.r  S

.624--?:§4fzs 

WRIT PE'l'ITION_.N(}

SMT. PARVA-THEVVA"D{}DLi...'= -- . V_
w/0 LA'rER..yiALLAPi?A--v " 
AGED A.E?:OK§jI'_?'2'vYEARS   .
R/O IEDIKERI, T-Q: '3)a.;Lr:Q»NGAL
DISTRi€3*:--_Bi?;LG.*\U'M"* "  

Sm'. _PARVATEiWA» %.1-'m__*11. %

w/no LmEmKKI'RAGQ1:pA
AGEI) Axaoufr 74" mans

R/O U£)uIKER£,-__TQ; BAILHONGAL

;.>xsfrR:c:r:-. B ELGAUM

é  MAb:wALAR
- A W/.0ALATE» IRAPPA

"  AG_E:._f76 Y-EARS
' -R/O 'BEHKVADI, TQ: BAILHONGAL

" .__44DISTR£{,fP: BELGAUM

 PETITIONERS

(3v_f._s;2:. H M nnanzeozm, ADV. ,)

THE STATE OF' KARNATAKA

BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF D.P.A.R. (POLITICAL PENSION)
M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE--I .



2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER _ 
BELGAUM DiSTRiC'1', BELGAUM  V e- --  e
 RESPGNDENTS - _  
(BY SR1. R K HAT'I'i, HCGP FQR ;a1'%,m ":22;-. "   '  j
THIS I>E'rI'r:0N mm) Vl,§?{DER"A_I§"FiCLES"V'§§$_é3!a 232'?"
OF COSN'i'I'I'U'i'I()N or mam mgvzne 'roe QUASH 'rm:
xmpuamen ORDERS m*.3/1/09%, 14/10/maxim 211/09
PASSED 31' mp: 18? RIE_SPON};)1i1¥{'i*.Vi!)E ANNEXURES-H, .1
AND K AND ETC., e    , . 

THIS w.;>. comme oi; F'{§i?:'f'REvL§;§;_€£zhiARY HEARING
THES DAY, THE C{)UR'IfIvir'iDi? 'I'iiE._FOI.J.,§)WiNG:

Mr.       notice for respondent

Nos. 1 A’

5 53-. _ tee matter is listed for pIel:nnnary’ ‘

” hcaim?C’8.i,.”iszit}2..¢”3neefifitVis mm up for final disposal’ .

husbands of all these petifioners china’ that

?_ ” ‘eghey Em the fteedem movement. Hence, they
for freedom fighters penésam. Accoztlingly, the
husbands make an application to the concerned

” eethofifies ibr grant of the send’ pension. Pursuant to the

/1

various orders in the year 1992 the
petitioners wen: grantcti fnccdozn fighters ‘V K
husband of the first petitioner 2
scoond petitioncfs husband died
pcfifioncfs husband died .__It’ 315 V
that till their death thg }’:iu§ba.1’1iis~–1’eo¢:-iived the
fitaedom fighters pcns:¢n:T’ T aficr their death
petitioners makc.a1 1 of fmcdom
fighters rejected. Hence
writ . This Court
mmanaed the matter in the

__ T» ‘ ‘iiiconsidemfion. Even after

mmaxgd. fighttm pension hm

V’ flezlcfi. petition qucs1:iomng’ the rejection

1~ Learned counsel for the pctitinfi submits that

eases this com has ruled that thc ciaim of the

for freedom fighters pension. cannot be denied, when

samaisyantcdtothehusbmds. Q

,_,z

X’

5. Mr. R K Hatti, submits that A
large scale fraud committed the
grant of freedom fighters pension.
add that in so fir as the

judgment ofthis Court they do: .:_:s.§if as w:+.:m1§aw.

6. Inde¢d, it noticed the
petitioners fighiacrs pension
way back ix; death pctifioncxs
continued Hence, I am of the view the
questionVV’ c~f: payment of freedom fighmrs
pension, : inoxem, hav’mg lewd to the

Court. Imam, it ‘m aim that
to pmduoc all those maficriak to prove

tbr freedom fighters pension. When the

V by their zwpoctivc husbands wm
and thcy wen: grantad the freedom fighters

_ consequently, I am of the View that mm maapuwed
cannot be susmfincd.

fl»

7. Petitions are allowed. *’.a.f

annexurcs – ‘H, J and K standsVg1;ashed;”‘Peia§itcf’ gtand#”‘ ‘V

remitted to the rcspondcnts to

petitioners for yam of of Vpgzi-aion oi? >

dccfmien rendered by this Cfifiipiiézieciyfgin three
months foam the ciatc vt2:2i_s §zd¢i:r. is issued

and made absolute.

8. __ ._is to file memo of

JUDGE

»;I31~’:e._