High Court Karnataka High Court

P Shameena vs The Deputy Commissioner Kodagu … on 13 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
P Shameena vs The Deputy Commissioner Kodagu … on 13 March, 2009
Author: Anand Byrareddy

.850′ P. “flagging:

L , * A 2»:ad;;m:~;; Ruad
FEE (SEE Building
V’ Vira}petTa1uk

:2»: THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA AT ,
xgzwrga Tms THE 15*” am?

THE H{.)N’BLE MR. 1UsT1c Ef§é;Na}z1§
WRIT PETYFION %2e3k

1- P.

Qfa RC.    '

:2. P. Sh;;3§5§§£;a;     
D50     

3. P. sha.m:d;3;' ye-4;-.~;    'L
Sig»;-';~ Cf  "

}sJ} i$f 3:51; izessasng at
- Sid£i.apz31'a'Vi1Iage

A' Kédagu Distriat



4 .

Madikcri Taiuk, Kodagu Dixirit:-E were Guvemmtsni lands agzd thai

this t}W!’It3!’i-3 ciaiming (he iamig have no pmprieiary righfi

lands, the Chizzf Scurciaty in the

appoinicd in huid an tznquiry bi: i§1t:*’. L’

sea:-and mspundcni has aff :};:3;’).iAi¢:;;v$:i¢;n in the:
{irst rczspundcnl, seeking v~:’gf’;f:1.!§§,:3,iii}fl of {he i:-ands
which Wtfiftt this <2;-.:;b:je:s:_i pefiiion and £9
iramsfcr the R favuur of the State:

Govemm¢fii;’ – T. i’:~.rae; “”m§m.~eq:,§é1:’i up¢3n the Chief St’:(‘.;’t:iaI’y

having mésié a Rcpui=£ :Ea; :[§3§ €1:§;¢r£ ihai ihe lanés inuimiirzg 1123: of

£311: iitiycrizmifézi lands. Them wag no fiaxis for the

figs: imving figiiiaicd pnmexsdings tmdcr

VS.i’.’;VtV’.i§i{33’V1” the Kmnaiaka. Lzmd Revenue Aci?

i9é%${7ner§ina§%:rT rcafcrmd in as ‘the .Act’ fur brq*:viiy)3 the

Had resisied the samtz. Huwttwsr, that 353$ msptznticni

to changcs the entry in Cuhxmn -6 of ihe RTE {mm

~ bani: it} urzmdettmui sags; maiai. Thfl said unitsr is wiihuui

: aufihuriiy or basis. The {ands in qiwsiion Wfifl: iniiiaiiy granted if}

$

6
Qfdfif. Accutdingly, the wrii pciiéétm is aflmveed. Annc::u_:r_g:- E is

quashed. The rcvttmst: tsnirittts in ihveur 01′ the miiiis,§::.§ir*.._4i:at

qiirccicd £0 he rcsiurcd.

{XV