High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Raghavendra vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 July, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Raghavendra vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 July, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi


mm mmm” U?’ %mmm”;mm Mum %.;;m,a;m ma mflwarmm %’§M.-EM aqua? Q? mnamgmm mm-1 GQUR? OE KARNATMCA I-HG!-«S CQQRT as MRNATAM mm £2

IN THE KIGI-I GOURT OF mmmm AT EAHGALORE

nmmzvrm mm was my :39 may 2009

BEl7’O%

‘rm H(31§”BLE uamzrmmn 3 A

–9–DCQv–vCC3CC

Aged about 23 years ‘ _
Sic: Subbaiah ”

Raafikzg atHo.4_92 ‘
2″


(By M[ ~13"   fiflankarapm
 Aam%.1%%%    A

 ..  A """ " 'V

Byfiafiaw Pvline ‘Station
~ ” …msm1~IBEN*r

%%%;mr em; % ‘ sum, HCGP)

% « « *-‘Iii-its c:RL.P U! 8 439 OF ‘rim C.R.P.C.. PRAYM3 m

THE PE’ImoNER 01¢ BAH. IN

% ‘C-E..KQ”.25f 2009 are Imsasm mmm srnnos wmcr-1

fI$'”‘NC3§W PENDIRG BEFCJRE ma: or-my JUDICIAL

f Tmaxmmm, BAHGALORE, PUNIsHABLE UNDER
sfimxcns 302 as 201 OF IPC.

‘l’h’zRtiti::nm:nfiagon£nrC)rd«mfi:isday,the

made the following:

a’-mam mmwma my mmmmmaamfl. nmw uuwx; UR” ikflkflfllfififi [“§%£:iH €M:£.’.mm ma Mwwamm MWM

wmm W?” %.%KW§&§§~%e.%§1@ $”‘M%»W””E m..mIm %3?”,_’W§*’2a§:5§’:”‘

Q..E.E.§.B

me xearma comma: for thc

2. ate petztIo’ ‘ 11 is ms w1thV .:fi % If %
in any almxge is given: to
the petitinnw to

Judge