IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No.4548 of 2010
Kali Rai ... ... Petitioner
Versus
Mineral Area Development Authority,
Dhanbad & ors. ... ... Respondents
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Roy, Advocate
For the MADA : Mr. Bhawesh Kumar, Advocate
-----
03/22.07.2011
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned
counsel appearing for the MADA.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner, who was working as ‘Khalashi’ under the respondent-MADA,
Dhanbad, got retired on 30th March, 2010 but post retiral dues have still not
been paid, though in this respect representation had been made before the
authority, but nothing has been done in this respect.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that
as per the case of the petitioner, the petitioner was supposed to get retire on
01.07.2008 on superannuation, but the petitioner, in fact, was allowed to work
till 30.03.2010 and hence, all the retiral benefits be given to the petitioner up to
the period the petitioner was allowed to work i.e. up to 30.03.2010.
Since, the matter is still to be adjudicated/determined by the
authority, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to
file a fresh representation along with a copy of this order before the respondent
No.1- Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Mineral Area Development Authority,
Dhanbad, raising all his claims, which have been claimed in this writ
application, within a period of three weeks from today. On receipt of such
representation, the respondent No.1 shall be taking decision in this respect
within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
(R.R. Prasad, J.)
Ravi/