IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 21748 of 2008(L)
1. A.R.PRABHAKARAN NAIR, SINDHU VILLA
... Petitioner
2. K.VASANTHAKUMARY
Vs
1. THE REGIONAL TRANPSORT AUTHORITY
... Respondent
2. THE REGIONAL TRANPSORT OFFICER
For Petitioner :SRI.K.RAVEENDRAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :08/08/2008
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) 21748 of 2008
--------------------------------------------------------
Dated: AUGUST 8, 2008
JUDGMENT
Petitioners’ complaint in this writ petition is that
though they had applied for a regular and temporary
permits, those applications were not considered by either of
the respondents.
2. It is now submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioners that the 1st respondent had taken up for
consideration Ext.P7 application for regular permit made
by the petitioners and that they were also heard on
4.8.2008. Presently the complaint is that orders have not
been passed on Ext.P7. Yet another complaint made by the
petitioners is that pending consideration of Ext.P7 regular
permit application, they have filed Ext.P9 application for
temporary permit and that orders on Ext.P9 is also not
passed.
3. I heard the learned Government Pleader also.
WP(C) 21748/08
2
4. If, as stated by the learned counsel for the
petitioners, the 1st respondent has already heard the parties
on Ext.P7 regular permit application, the 1st respondent
shall pass orders on it, as expeditiously as possible, at
any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this
judgment. It is also directed that the 2nd respondent shall
pass orders on Ext.P9 temporary permit application as
expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 7 days of
production of a copy of this judgment.
5. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment
before the respondents for compliance.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE
mt/-