D Subramani vs State Of Karnataka Rep By Chief … on 5 January, 2009

A"' gBy Sri kc. mgagaj, Adv.)
  'S2233 of Kamataka,

  "  VVidhana Soudha, Bangalore ~«-« 1.

IN THE. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG.AJ».;€RE: j  T " 
DATED TIIIS THE 5*" DAY OF JANUARY  '  Z
BEFORE _ ._ % .
THE HO2\rsflLE MR.JUSTICE S,_ A31).=:.;:i =N:4Z£z';'R: ,   1  
PKRIT P_£'T1T10NN0.35o322égaa (s--R£'s::}%"f  %%
Between:  AV X ' V H
1 D. Subramaxfi, V
SE0 C11iz1z1aswa.:;3:y,V.__  V    
Aged about   .       
Occ;\'v'atea;xi}1:2£11, '*Vv~--"*_V V     '
Tova: Mu11igip%;1_l;Ceufis:£i.,  ._ " 

Birur,  " _ .
Chiiwé1=,  . h "  
Bangalorewl.  '
I-1.0. Loicgsiy  
S;'oObalz%;1pv&§'?'V' _. _   '_ 
Aged   ' V V
Occ;\Kr'a1e;f1n2.3;1, 9   «.  
Hu'Ii'zfl".aI1i:;('irafi1 Fafichayai, "  '  ' "
Kadu; Taitak, .Cl1ik11'xagaéur District.

9)!

6 H. Kariazrpagv  _ 
SE0 Hamnxianflzappa, " "
j  about  years;
_  gyaierlxlém ..... .. v
 ' Ht"1Ilah_ai1i._Gram Panchayat,
" "   Cbikmzigaiur District.

7 V V  I).'I'. Nfahésh,
--- SfQ"I'i1?:2ixI11a1'ayapi;}a,
Aged about 28 years,
A. ,  ®c:; Watezman,
_ "gHuIIahaIliG1'atn Panchayat,
' " Kadur Taink, Claikmagalur District. .... Respondents.

infiucmo1;s.”NA-3 ::csV’is’.-» _ V ” ”

This Writ Petition £3 filed under Articles 225 & 22*? e£[§h;§[” *
Constitution, praying to quash the impugned order dated,

etc. . :

This Writ Petition coming on for

Group this day, the Court made the foiiafiézlgz ”
0129121:

Leamed Coum-Ia! for éaenm
requesting this Court {:0 dismiss, flf–Ie fsince it has

becomeinfi’uctuons.?_.V

2. mexflii fii–edVV_l§3< %theLIéa;i1ed_'=$ounsel for the petiti-:meI's

is piaced on r'ec_oi*d, Hisnxissed as having become

Sd/-.

Judge