Gujarat High Court High Court

General vs Special on 5 March, 2010

Gujarat High Court
General vs Special on 5 March, 2010
Author: K.M.Thaker,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/1211/2001	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 1211 of 2001
 

In
FIRST APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2401 of 2000
 

To


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 1218 of 2001
 

In
FIRST APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2408 of 2000
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

GENERAL
MANAGER, MEHSANA PROJECT - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

SPECIAL
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
RAJNI H MEHTA for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 1 -
2. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 05/03/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Rule.

Heard
learned advocate Mr. Rajni Mehta for the applicants, learned advocate
Mr. Jani for the opponent no.2 and Ms. Jhaveri for opponent no.1.
With the request of the parties the applications are taken up for
decision today.

Present
applications have been taken out by applicant-General Manager,
Mehsana Project, ONGC Ltd., Mehsana, seeking leave to appeal and to
challenge the award passed by the Reference Court in Land Reference
Case Nos. 2597 of 1993 to 2604 of 1993 dated 4/8/1999.

Learned
advocate Mr. Jani submitted that he has instruction to appear on
behalf of the opponent no.2. In view of the fact that the applicant
who is seeking leave to appeal is the body and on whose behalf the
acquisition in question was undertaken. Learned advocate Mr. Jani
has fairly submitted that he has no objection if the leave to appeal
is granted. Learned AGP Ms. Jirga Jhaveri who appears for opponent
no.1 in each application has also stated to the same effect.

Hence,
the relief prayed for in para-7(A) is granted. The applicants are
granted leave to appeal. Rule is made absolute in terms of
para-7(A). The applications are disposed of accordingly.

(K.M.THAKER,
J.)

(ila)

   

Top